Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |        but of none of the other. Consequently there cannot be a syllogism.
 2      I, 5 |      assumed to belong to all O: consequently N will belong to no O. This
 3      I, 6 |         S will belong to some R: consequently since P belongs to all S,
 4      I, 6 |         S will belong to some P: consequently since R belongs to all S,
 5      I, 7 |       saw) is the middle figure. Consequently, since all syllogisms in
 6      I, 7 |  syllogisms in the first figure: consequently also the particular syllogisms
 7      I, 10|          But A belongs to all C; consequently B is possible of no C. For
 8      I, 10|          but A belongs to all B, consequently C is possible of none of
 9      I, 10|    necessarily belongs to all B. Consequently it is necessary that C does
10      I, 10|        belongs to nothing white. Consequently under these conditions the
11      I, 10|         but A belongs to some C; consequently B necessarily does not belong
12      I, 11| convertible into the particular: consequently if A belongs necessarily
13      I, 11|         convertible with some A: consequently if B belongs necessarily
14      I, 11|    belong to some B necessarily: consequently if A belongs to none of
15      I, 11|        proved was not necessary: consequently it is not here either. Further,
16      I, 12|       premiss must be necessary. Consequently this also is clear, that
17      I, 13|         follow from one another; consequently their opposites also, "it
18      I, 13|         the other a problematic. Consequently we must start from premisses
19      I, 14|      This has been stated above. Consequently if B is possible for all
20      I, 14|         it should belong to any. Consequently there cannot be a syllogism
21      I, 15|         assumed to be possible), consequently B will be possible: for
22      I, 16|    belong to all C or to some C. Consequently B will not be possible for
23      I, 17|       that all that can be this: consequently the negative proposition
24      I, 17|       belongs to some of the As: consequently A necessarily belongs to
25      I, 17|   assumed, no absurdity results: consequently no syllogism. It is clear
26      I, 19|     affirmations be established: consequently no syllogism is possible.
27      I, 22|        did not belong to some C; consequently here it follows that A does
28      I, 23|       conceded at the beginning. Consequently, since the falsehood is
29      I, 24|     premisses and from one only: consequently if the conclusion is universal,
30      I, 25|          added from any quarter. Consequently since the premisses were (
31      I, 25|         will not be constructed. Consequently the conclusions will be
32      I, 28|        to all E, and A to all C, consequently A belongs to all E. If C
33      I, 28|          D: but G falls under E: consequently A will not belong to some
34      I, 28|     belong to all A and to no E. Consequently B must be identical with
35      I, 28|     belong to all A and to no G. Consequently B must be identical with
36      I, 29|        and find the middle term. Consequently a syllogism cannot be formed
37      I, 30|  peculiar are the most numerous. Consequently it is the business of experience
38      I, 30|        any other art or science. Consequently, if the attributes of the
39      I, 31|        of substance and essence. Consequently they did not understand
40      I, 31|        every D is either B or C, consequently man must be either mortal
41      I, 31|          to be a mortal animal); consequently it is necessary that man
42      I, 32|        necessary is a syllogism. Consequently, though something results
43      I, 34|      should belong to every man, consequently it is not possible that
44      I, 35|       contains two right angles, consequently there will be no middle
45      I, 36|         is not a sign of a sign, consequently laughter is not a sign.
46      I, 38|         represents is something. Consequently A is true of C: there will
47      I, 45|          then belongs to some B. Consequently we shall get the first figure,
48      I, 46|          log and be a white log; consequently if the affirmation does
49      I, 46|          that it is a white log. Consequently D is true, but A is not
50     II, 1 |          another definite thing. Consequently all syllogisms save the
51     II, 1 |          B does not belong to A, consequently it does not result through
52     II, 1 |       which is not demonstrated: consequently either a conclusion is not
53     II, 2 |          A will belong to all C; consequently though both the premisses
54     II, 2 |     animal belongs to every man. Consequently if one term is taken to
55     II, 2 |       man belongs to some white; consequently if man be taken as middle
56     II, 2 |       belongs to no black thing. Consequently if it should be assumed
57     II, 2 |        belongs to nothing black. Consequently if it is assumed that A
58     II, 3 |       white belongs to no pitch. Consequently if it is assumed that A
59     II, 3 |       follow every footed thing. Consequently if it is assumed that A
60     II, 4 |         not to everything black. Consequently if it is assumed that B
61     II, 4 |         to everything beautiful. Consequently if it is assumed that A
62     II, 4 |       and black to some animals. Consequently if it is assumed that A
63     II, 5 |        ex hypothesi been proved. Consequently if we succeed in demonstrating
64     II, 5 |          should belong to all C. Consequently each of the three propositions
65     II, 6 |          to all A and B to no C, consequently B belongs to no A: neither
66     II, 6 |       the premisses is negative; consequently a syllogism will not be
67     II, 9 |    premisses taken is universal. Consequently the proposition AB is not
68     II, 11|          But this is impossible: consequently the supposition is false:
69     II, 11|        does not belong to all B. Consequently it is clear that the universal
70     II, 11|        that A belongs to all C): consequently if this is false, it is
71     II, 11|        that A belongs to some B; consequently it is true that A belongs
72     II, 11|         for A belongs to some B. Consequently we must not suppose that
73     II, 12|        that C belongs to all B): consequently the hypothesis is false.
74     II, 12|         C should belong to no B. Consequently, if this is impossible,
75     II, 12| originally it belonged to all B, consequently the hypothesis is false:
76     II, 15|      affirmatively of the other. Consequently it is possible that contradictories
77     II, 17|          in an ascending series. Consequently since the impossibility
78     II, 20| affirmative, the other negative: consequently, if what is laid down is
79     II, 21|       knows that A belongs to D. Consequently if again he thinks that
80     II, 21|       contains two right angles; consequently he will know and not know
81     II, 21|    knowledge of the particulars; consequently his knowledge will not be
82     II, 21|         which is proper to them; consequently it is possible that we may
83     II, 21|         exercise such knowledge: consequently three kinds of error also
84     II, 21|       and similarly that B is A, consequently that C is A. For just as
85     II, 22|        is preferable to D, and C consequently is less an object of aversion
86     II, 26|          try to make objections. Consequently we bring objections in these