| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] these 91 thesis 13 they 85 thing 79 things 59 think 11 thinking 3 | Frequency [« »] 82 suppose 81 being 80 he 79 thing 79 whether 77 made 76 problematic | Aristotle Prior Analytics IntraText - Concordances thing |
Book, Paragraph
1 I, 1 | affirming or denying one thing of another. This is either 2 I, 3 | garment. For if any white thing must be a garment, then 3 I, 5 | 5~Whenever the same thing belongs to all of one subject, 4 I, 11| should belong to some white thing, but it is possible that 5 I, 13| what naturally belongs to a thing (for this has not its necessity 6 I, 15| meaning that if some single thing A is, B will be: for nothing 7 I, 15| from the being of some one thing, but from two at least, 8 I, 15| were impossible, the same thing would at the same time be 9 I, 15| no B: for no intelligent thing is a raven. But B is possible 10 I, 17| is possible that no white thing should be a man: for many 11 I, 23| the assertion of some one thing concerning some other single 12 I, 23| concerning some other single thing. Thus we must take another 13 I, 23| establish the attribution of one thing to another, unless some 14 I, 24| are equal, he will beg the thing to be proved, unless he 15 I, 25| than one, or (ii) the same thing happens to be inferred by 16 I, 27| as a rule each sensible thing is such that it cannot be 17 I, 27| and the properties of the thing; next we must lay down those 18 I, 27| attributes which follow the thing, and again those which the 19 I, 27| and again those which the thing follows, and those which 20 I, 27| but those which follow the thing as a whole, e.g. not what 21 I, 28| cannot belong to the same thing, all arguments can be reduced 22 I, 28| cannot belong to the same thing. For if these are taken, 23 I, 28| cannot belong to the same thing, it follows that A will 24 I, 28| cannot belong to the same thing differs in no way from the 25 I, 30| if the attributes of the thing are apprehended, our business 26 I, 31| accident or property of a thing, nor about its genus, nor 27 I, 32| elements out of which a thing is made are annihilated, 28 I, 34| possibly belong to the same thing, but cannot belong to one 29 I, 34| could belong to the same thing, they could belong to one 30 I, 35| assumed to be an individual thing, but sometimes a complex 31 I, 36| which the assertion that a thing "is" may be said to be true. 32 I, 36| but in the premisses one thing is not stated of another.~ 33 I, 38| something" indicates the thing’s special nature. But if " 34 I, 41| existence of this particular thing, but imitate the geometrician 35 I, 44| is sickly: for the same thing will then be at the same 36 I, 46| they do not mean the same thing, nor is "to be not-white" 37 I, 46| the same time to the same thing. As then "not to know what 38 I, 46| never belong to the same thing; and either C or D will 39 I, 46| never belong to the same thing. And B must belong to everything 40 I, 46| it is impossible that a thing should simultaneously be 41 I, 46| which A belongs. But since a thing cannot be simultaneously 42 I, 46| together belong to the same thing, and that B and D may possibly 43 I, 46| possibly belong to the same thing.~Privative terms are similarly 44 I, 46| the same time to the same thing, and one of the two necessarily 45 I, 46| D may belong to the same thing, but B and C cannot. First 46 I, 46| cannot belong to the same thing; it is clear that D must 47 I, 46| should belong to the same thing. But B and C cannot belong 48 I, 46| cannot belong to the same thing, because A follows C; and 49 I, 46| the same time to the same thing.~It results sometimes even 50 I, 46| the same time to the same thing, but it is necessary that 51 I, 46| belongs to everything ever thing to which C belongs. Therefore 52 II, 1 | conclusion states one definite thing about another definite thing. 53 II, 1 | thing about another definite thing. Consequently all syllogisms 54 II, 2 | will turn out that the same thing both is and is not at the 55 II, 2 | false: for then the same thing will belong and not belong 56 II, 2 | So A is posited as one thing, being two premisses taken 57 II, 2 | every swan and to some white thing, and white to every swan, 58 II, 2 | e.g. animal to some white thing, but to no snow, and white 59 II, 2 | man and to every footed thing, and man to some footed 60 II, 2 | snow, but to some white thing, and snow to some white 61 II, 2 | and snow to some white thing. If then snow is taken as 62 II, 2 | swan belongs to no black thing. Consequently if it should 63 II, 2 | white belongs to no black thing. If then it is assumed that 64 II, 3 | not follow every footed thing. Consequently if it is assumed 65 II, 4 | impossible that the same thing should be necessitated by 66 II, 4 | the not-being of the same thing. I mean, for example, that 67 II, 5 | the demonstration the very thing that is being proved: for 68 II, 15| of both extremes, but one thing is denied of it, and it 69 II, 15| contrary to the fact, e.g. if a thing is good, it is proved that 70 II, 16| merely say a particular thing is, if it is: in this way 71 II, 21| know and not know the same thing in respect of the same thing. 72 II, 21| thing in respect of the same thing. Again if a man were to 73 II, 21| know and not know the same thing at the same time. For the 74 II, 21| For we know no sensible thing, once it has passed beyond 75 II, 21| mistaken about the same thing, provided that his knowledge 76 II, 21| bad will think the same thing to be the essence of good 77 II, 23| things belong to the same thing, and the extreme is convertible 78 II, 27| that when it is another thing is, or when it has come 79 II, 27| manner of speaking. The same thing then will be found in another