Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |       Whenever three terms are so related to one another that the
 2      I, 4 |       whole, the extremes must be related by a perfect syllogism.
 3      I, 4 |           from the terms being so related; for it is possible that
 4      I, 4 |         the terms are universally related, it is clear in this figure
 5      I, 4 |        possible the terms must be related as described, and if they
 6      I, 4 |     described, and if they are so related there will be a syllogism.~
 7      I, 4 |     syllogism.~But if one term is related universally, the other in
 8      I, 4 |      minor term, or the terms are related in any other way, a syllogism
 9      I, 4 |     conclusion, the terms must be related as we have stated: if they
10      I, 4 |          have stated: if they are related otherwise, no syllogism
11      I, 5 |       valid whether the terms are related universally or not.~If then
12      I, 5 |        not.~If then the terms are related universally a syllogism
13      I, 5 |      formed when the terms are so related, but not a perfect syllogism;
14      I, 5 |         the terms are universally related, the terms must be related
15      I, 5 |        related, the terms must be related as we stated at the outset:
16      I, 5 |         for if they are otherwise related no necessary consequence
17      I, 5 |    follows.~If the middle term is related universally to one of the
18      I, 5 |       whenever the middle term is related universally to the major
19      I, 5 |         of which the extremes are related positively and universally,
20      I, 5 |        neither universally, or is related to them indefinitely. Common
21      I, 5 |        said that if the terms are related to one another in the way
22      I, 5 |   syllogism, the terms must be so related. But it is evident also
23      I, 6 |       valid whether the terms are related universally or not to the
24      I, 6 |        when not, if the terms are related universally. For whenever
25      I, 6 |          possible. If one term is related universally to the middle,
26      I, 6 |     particular. When the minor is related universally to the middle,
27      I, 6 |           wild. When the major is related universally to the middle,
28      I, 6 |   syllogism, the terms must be so related. It is clear also that all
29      I, 7 |          of different figures are related to one another.~
30      I, 8 |       syllogisms with differently related terms, one syllogism concluding
31      I, 11|         figure when the terms are related universally to the middle,
32      I, 14|        then that if the terms are related in this manner, no syllogism
33      I, 14|      proved that if the terms are related in this manner it is both
34      I, 15|       Suppose, the terms being so related, that A is possible, and
35      I, 15|       i.e. when the premisses are related in the manner stated to
36      I, 16|      syllogism when the terms are related as before; and a perfect
37      I, 19|       positive when the terms are related as above. Nor can the opposite
38      I, 19|           For if the terms are so related, there are cases in which
39      I, 22|     obtain if one of the terms is related universally to the middle,
40      I, 23|           taken, which is somehow related to each by way of predication.
41      I, 25|       that of these one should be related to another as whole to part:
42      I, 25|         some of its terms must be related in this way. Suppose then
43      I, 25|  premisses. But if C and D are so related that one is whole, the other
44      I, 25|       another. But if C is not so related to D as to make a syllogism,
45      I, 25|          one fewer than the terms related), and the premisses will
46      I, 41|    general, if two things are not related as whole to part and part
47      I, 46|     Privative terms are similarly related positive ter terms respect
48      I, 46| everything, and again C and D are related in the same way, and A follows
49      I, 46|         to: and again C and D are related in the same way, and follows
50      I, 46|          everything: for they are related as affirmation and denial.
51     II, 4 |       that when two things are so related to one another, that if
52     II, 15|           are either identical or related as whole to part. Otherwise
53     II, 15|           are either identical or related as whole and part. It is
54     II, 16| demonstration. If however B is so related to C that they are identical,
55     II, 16|         when the terms are really related in the manner described,
56     II, 16|    according to common opinion so related.~
57     II, 17|         original hypothesis is so related to the impossible conclusion,
58     II, 17|          the impossibility is not related to the original terms, the
59     II, 20|         and how its terms must be related, it is clear when refutation
60     II, 20|    possible whether the terms are related in affirmative propositions
61     II, 22|     opposites: and C is similarly related to D, since they also are
62     II, 23|      clear then how the terms are related in conversion, and in respect
63     II, 27|         formed when the terms are related in this way: for though