Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 7 |     evident also that in all the figures, whenever a proper syllogism
 2      I, 7 |      Similarly also in the other figures: a syllogism always results
 3      I, 7 |        same syllogism in all the figures.~It is clear too that all
 4      I, 7 |          syllogisms of different figures are related to one another.~
 5      I, 16|        perfected by means of the figures above mentioned.]~
 6      I, 19|        completed by means of the figures mentioned.~
 7      I, 22|       any more than in the other figures. Suppose first that the
 8      I, 23|          the syllogisms in these figures are made perfect by means
 9      I, 23|    through one or other of these figures.~It is necessary that every
10      I, 23|         of C), and these are the figures of which we have spoken,
11      I, 23|         in one or other of these figures. The argument is the same
12      I, 23|        by means of the aforesaid figures; these considerations will
13      I, 23|       effected by means of these figures, it is evident that syllogisms
14      I, 23|       will be made through these figures. Likewise all the other
15      I, 23|     formed by means of the three figures mentioned above. But when
16      I, 26|       which is concluded in many figures and through many moods is
17      I, 26|        which is concluded in few figures and through few moods is
18      I, 26|    negative is proved in all the figures, but once in the first,
19      I, 26|    negative is proved in all the figures, the universal negative
20      I, 26|         we found possible in two figures. But particular statements
21      I, 26|        proof is possible in more figures and through more moods.
22      I, 26|    figure, and the number of the figures appropriate to each problem,
23      I, 28|    proceed through the aforesaid figures. For it is proved that A
24      I, 28|    proceed through the aforesaid figures, and we must not select
25      I, 29|        one of the aforementioned figures, and these cannot be composed
26      I, 32| syllogisms to the aforementioned figures: for this part of the inquiry
27      I, 32|          into the aforementioned figures, our original problem would
28      I, 32|        both premisses in all the figures.~If then the middle term
29      I, 32|        must not look for all the figures, but for that which is appropriate
30      I, 32|    thesis is established in more figures than one, we shall recognize
31      I, 44|          such arguments into the figures. And we have explained the
32      I, 45|          in order to resolve the figures into one another the premiss
33      I, 45|         be converted in both the figures: for when this premiss is
34      I, 45|      cannot be resolved in these figures which could not be resolved
35      I, 45|         syllogisms, and that the figures may be resolved into one
36     II, 1 |      explained the number of the figures, the character and number
37     II, 1 |           Similarly in the other figures. That which is subordinate
38     II, 7 |       are not made through those figures themselves either are not
39     II, 10|          the middle and the last figures, and the premiss which concerns
40     II, 10|   through the first and the last figures, and the premiss which concerns
41     II, 10|         the first and the middle figures; the premiss which concerns
42     II, 11|        it can be made in all the figures. For it resembles conversion,
43     II, 11|           Similarly in the other figures: for whatever moods admit
44     II, 11|       per impossibile in all the figures, excepting the universal
45     II, 11|          in the middle and third figures, but not in the first. Suppose
46     II, 12|          the middle and the last figures this also is proved. Suppose
47     II, 14|          in the first and middle figures, if affirmative in first,
48     II, 14|        we obtain immediately the figures through which each problem
49     II, 15|        how many ways and in what figures a syllogism can be made
50     II, 16|          in the middle and third figures in both ways, though, if
51     II, 16|      only in the third and first figures. If the syllogism is negative,
52     II, 23|        by means of the aforesaid figures, but also rhetorical syllogisms
53     II, 26|         two ways and through two figures; in two ways because every
54     II, 26|  universal or particular, by two figures because objections are brought
55     II, 26|      only in the first and third figures. If a man maintains a universal
56     II, 26|        bring objections in these figures only: for in them only are
57     II, 27|        of the middle term in the figures. For it may be taken as