Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 3 |         possible, then no B could possibly be A. This has been already
 2      I, 13|        which is not necessary may possibly not belong, it is clear
 3      I, 13|         or of that of which B may possibly be stated. It makes no difference
 4      I, 13|        that the expression "A may possibly belong to all B" might be
 5      I, 14|                 14~Whenever A may possibly belong to all B, and B to
 6      I, 14|     syllogism to prove that A may possibly belong to all C. This is
 7      I, 14|         of those things which can possibly fall under the term B is
 8      I, 14|           is necessary that A may possibly not belong to some of the
 9      I, 14|         possible for all B, B may possibly not belong to some C, then
10      I, 14|        and it is laid down that B possibly may belong to some C, we
11      I, 14|          simply or necessarily or possibly. It is clear that there
12      I, 15|  syllogism results proving that A possibly belongs to no C.~It is clear
13      I, 15|          A belongs to no B, but B possibly belongs to all C. These
14      I, 15|            it is necessary that A possibly belongs to no C. Suppose
15      I, 15|          all C: for every man may possibly be intelligent. But A necessarily
16      I, 15|        belong to all B, and let B possibly belong to no C. If the terms
17      I, 15|      premiss indicates that B may possibly belong to no C. Through
18      I, 15|        belongs to no B, and B may possibly belong to no C. Through
19      I, 15|       belong to any C, instead of possibly not belonging, there cannot
20      I, 15|           B or to no B, and B may possibly not belong to some C. For
21      I, 16|           be necessary, and let A possibly not belong to any B, and
22      I, 16|        and it is laid down that A possibly does not belong to any B,
23      I, 17|      belong to some of the As may possibly not belong to any A, just
24      I, 17| necessarily belongs to some A may possibly belong to all A. If any
25      I, 19|         does not belong to B, and possibly may not belong to C: if
26      I, 19|        belongs to no A, and A may possibly belong to all C: thus we
27      I, 20|     suppose that both A and B may possibly belong to every C. Since
28      I, 20|           a particular, and B may possibly belong to every C, it follows
29      I, 20|          C, it follows that C may possibly belong to some B. So, if
30      I, 20|        first figure. And A if may possibly belong to no C, but B may
31      I, 20|         belong to no C, but B may possibly belong to all C, it follows
32      I, 20|          C, it follows that A may possibly not belong to some B: for
33      I, 20|        before. For if A and B may possibly not belong to C, if "may
34      I, 20|          not belong to C, if "may possibly belong" is substituted we
35      I, 20|  propositions. Suppose that A may possibly belong to all C, and B to
36      I, 21|       belongs to all C, and B may possibly belong to all C. If the
37      I, 21|         the conclusion that A may possibly belong to some of the Bs.
38      I, 21|       belongs to all C, and A may possibly not belong to some C: it
39      I, 21|       some C: it follows that may possibly not belong to some B. For
40      I, 21|          at the outset that A may possibly not belong to some C.~Whenever
41      I, 22|       belongs to all C, and B may possibly belong to all C. Since then
42      I, 22|     necessary: i.e. suppose A may possibly belong to no C, but B necessarily
43      I, 22|       will be not only that A may possibly not belong to some B but
44      I, 22|          it resulted that A might possibly not belong to some C, and
45      I, 22|           B, and sometimes cannot possibly belong to any B. To illustrate
46      I, 28|           attributes which cannot possibly be present in the predicate
47      I, 28|           attributes which cannot possibly be present in the subject,
48      I, 28|          terms in question cannot possibly belong to any of the other.
49      I, 28|           attributes which cannot possibly belong to the predicate
50      I, 28|           attributes which cannot possibly belong to A by D. Suppose
51      I, 28|           attributes which cannot possibly belong to E, or if those
52      I, 34|           general contraries, may possibly belong to the same thing,
53      I, 46|       thing, and that B and D may possibly belong to the same thing.~
54     II, 1 |      belong to some A: for it may possibly belong to all A.~This then