Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 2 |         is not man, it does not follow that some man is not animal.~
 2      I, 8 |     conclusion will necessarily follow. But if the relation is
 3      I, 13|         are either identical or follow from one another; consequently
 4      I, 13|     will either be identical or follow from one another. For of
 5      I, 15|     being, B’s possibility will follow necessarily from A’s possibility.
 6      I, 15|       then B’s possibility will follow from A’s possibility (and
 7      I, 17|     belong to no B, it does not follow that B may belong to no
 8      I, 17|         no A. For suppose it to follow and assume that B may belong
 9      I, 17|        can be that, it does not follow that all that can be this:
10      I, 17|       admitted, for it does not follow that some A is necessarily
11      I, 20|      necessary consequence will follow from them as they are stated,
12      I, 20|     syllogistic conclusion will follow from the premisses as they
13      I, 20|        as they are put, it will follow if they are converted, as
14      I, 22|        possible. The proof will follow the same course as where
15      I, 25|      part, some conclusion will follow from them also; and it must
16      I, 25|        the conclusions will not follow the same arrangement either
17      I, 27|     down those attributes which follow the thing, and again those
18      I, 27|         Of the attributes which follow we must distinguish those
19      I, 27|     must select not those which follow some particular but those
20      I, 27|      particular but those which follow the thing as a whole, e.g.
21      I, 27|         one must not suppose to follow as a whole, e.g. that every
22      I, 27|      obtain the attributes that follow, is contained by something
23      I, 27|        what follows or does not follow the highest term universally
24      I, 27|     follows man, that it should follow all these also. But these
25      I, 28|        and the attributes which follow that of which it is to be
26      I, 28|        to E: but if it does not follow KF, it may yet follow F.
27      I, 28|       not follow KF, it may yet follow F. Similarly we must consider
28      I, 28|    primary antecedents, it will follow those also which are subordinate,
29      I, 28| subordinate, but if it does not follow the former, it may yet follow
30      I, 28|   follow the former, it may yet follow the latter.~It is clear
31      I, 34|      disease). It would seem to follow that health cannot belong
32      I, 38|         the conclusion will not follow: for A will be true of B,
33      I, 41|        is truly stated, it will follow that A can be said of all
34      I, 46|        be reversed, then D must follow B and the relation cannot
35      I, 46|         it is clear that D must follow B. Again since C does not
36      I, 46|       since H follows F, B must follow D: for we know this. If
37      I, 46|        then A follows C, B must follow D". But this is false: for
38     II, 2 |         every man, but does not follow some white, but man belongs
39     II, 3 |   lifeless, and number does not follow some lifeless things. If
40     II, 3 |       wholes, though B does not follow some C, e.g. a genus in
41     II, 3 |         whole, but man does not follow every footed thing. Consequently
42     II, 3 |       wholes, though B does not follow some C. For if it is assumed
43     II, 3 |       is possible that A should follow no B and all C, though B
44     II, 3 |         though science does not follow every man. If then A is
45     II, 3 |      the whole of B, and not to follow some C, the premisses are
46     II, 4 |        that both A and B should follow all C, though A does not
47     II, 4 |        B, e.g. animal and white follow every swan, though animal
48     II, 12|      this is false, it does not follow that it is true that A belongs
49     II, 17|        same false result should follow from several hypotheses,
50     II, 20|         is possible it does not follow that a refutation is possible.
51     II, 26|        to B, because C does not follow B. This can be made clear