Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 3 |        premisses can no longer be converted like the simple negatives;
 2      I, 6 |       again, if the premiss RS is converted.~But when the minor is negative,
 3      I, 7 |          for if the premisses are converted it is necessary that C does
 4      I, 10|           the negative premiss is converted, the first figure results.
 5      I, 11|          If the proposition BC is converted the first figure is formed,
 6      I, 13|        possible to belong" may be converted into "it is possible not
 7      I, 13|  propositions in this mode can be converted. For since that which is
 8      I, 14|          but if the premiss BC is converted after the manner of problematic
 9      I, 14|        premisses, but if they are converted we shall have the same syllogism
10      I, 14|         the particular premiss is converted and it is laid down that
11      I, 15|        the problematic premiss is converted, a syllogism will be possible,
12      I, 15|          if the proposition BC is converted and it is assumed that B
13      I, 15|        the problematic premiss is converted, we shall have a syllogism.
14      I, 15|          For if the premiss BC is converted in respect of possibility,
15      I, 18|           negative proposition is converted, B will belong to no A.
16      I, 18|        the problematic premiss is converted into its complementary affirmative
17      I, 19|           the negative premiss is converted B will belong to no A: but
18      I, 19|           C: if the premisses are converted B belongs to no A, and A
19      I, 19|        the problematic premiss is converted into its complementary affirmative.
20      I, 20|          but if the premisses are converted into their corresponding
21      I, 20|         the particular premiss is converted. For if A is possible for
22      I, 20|           will follow if they are converted, as above. But when both
23      I, 21|          If the proposition BC is converted, we shall have the first
24      I, 21|       they stand, but if they are converted a syllogism is obtained
25      I, 22|     affirmative proposition BC is converted, we shall have the first
26      I, 28|           with G, there will be a converted syllogism: for E will belong
27      I, 29|           that if this premiss is converted, and the other remains as
28      I, 45|         the negative statement is converted, we shall have the middle
29      I, 45|           of all C: then C can be converted partially with either A
30      I, 45|         the minor extreme must be converted in both the figures: for
31     II, 5 |     conclusion and the premiss BC converted, and similarly the proposition
32     II, 5 |     conclusion and the premiss AB converted. But it is necessary to
33     II, 5 |  proposition AB must no longer be converted as before: for the premiss "
34     II, 5 |           if the other premiss is converted: for the result is that
35     II, 5 |          if the proposition AB is converted as in the universal syllogism,
36     II, 8 |         whether the conclusion is converted into its contradictory or
37     II, 8 |           B.~If the conclusion is converted into its contradictory,
38     II, 8 |        affirmative, and let it be converted as stated. Then if A belongs
39     II, 8 | syllogisms when the conclusion is converted into its contradictory,
40     II, 8 |           refuted, but when it is converted into its contrary, neither.
41     II, 8 |      refuted if the conclusion is converted into its contrary. For if
42     II, 9 |         of the first syllogism is converted into its contrary, the conclusion
43     II, 9 |           if the conclusion BC is converted into its contradictory,
44     II, 9 |            when the conclusion is converted into its contrary neither
45     II, 9 |              if the conclusion is converted into its contradictory,
46     II, 9 |          But if the conclusion is converted into its contradictory,
47     II, 10|     figure when the conclusion is converted into its contrary, neither
48     II, 10|        but when the conclusion is converted into its contradictory,
49     II, 10|          But if the conclusion is converted into its contradictory,
50     II, 10|     figure when the conclusion is converted; when a result contrary
51     II, 23|          to the predicate that is converted. But we must apprehend C