Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 6 |        and another to none, of a third, or if both belong to all,
 2      I, 6 |         I call such a figure the third; by middle term in it I
 3      I, 7 |        figure. Syllogisms in the third figure, if the terms are
 4      I, 7 |     particular syllogisms in the third figure may be so reduced.
 5      I, 8 |          another from what is, a third from what is possible.~There
 6      I, 8 |       negative, and again in the third figure when the universal
 7      I, 9 |     first figure and through the third that A belongs necessarily
 8      I, 15|       syllogism is formed in the third degree. But it was assumed
 9      I, 15|          have a syllogism in the third figure: but this is impossible.
10      I, 22|       figure follows also in the third. But when the minor premiss
11      I, 26|    second, in three moods in the third. It is clear then that the
12      I, 34|       belong to any man". In the third figure the fallacy results
13      I, 36|      middle is not stated of the third term, e.g. if wisdom is
14      I, 36|     middle term is stated of the third, but the first is not stated
15      I, 36|    middle, nor the middle of the third, while the first is sometimes
16      I, 36|          sometimes stated of the third, and sometimes not: e.g.
17      I, 41|         if B is said of all of a third term, so also is A: but
18      I, 41|        is not said of all of the third term, there is no necessity
19      I, 45|          Again syllogisms in the third figure cannot all be resolved
20      I, 45|         can be resolved into the third. Let A belong to all B and
21      I, 45|   belonged to all B: so that the third figure is formed. Similarly
22      I, 45|     cannot, be resolved into the third figure. Whenever the universal
23      I, 45|    conversion.~Syllogisms in the third figure can be resolved into
24     II, 5 |     through these terms that the third belongs to the middle or
25     II, 7 |                         7~In the third figure, when both premisses
26     II, 7 |         is made both through the third and through the first figure-if
27     II, 7 |      second and the last. In the third figure all proofs are made
28     II, 7 |        is clear also that in the third figure and in the middle
29     II, 8 |      always proceeds through the third since it is necessary to
30     II, 9 | refutation will always be in the third figure, and in this figure (
31     II, 10|                        10~In the third figure when the conclusion
32     II, 10|         through the last. In the third figure the refutation proceeds
33     II, 11|         proved in the middle and third figures, but not in the
34     II, 14|        it has been proved in the third figure that A belongs to
35     II, 15|          contradictories.~In the third figure an affirmative syllogism
36     II, 15|       reversed. Similarly in the third figure. So it is clear in
37     II, 16|         begged in the middle and third figures in both ways, though,
38     II, 16|         affirmative, only in the third and first figures. If the
39     II, 23|      major term to belong to the third term by means of the middle,
40     II, 23|       the middle by means of the third. In the order of nature,
41     II, 24|         term which resembles the third. It ought to be known both
42     II, 24|        the middle belongs to the third term, and that the first
43     II, 24|         that which resembles the third. For example let A be evil,
44     II, 26|     proved only in the first and third figures. If a man maintains
45     II, 26|      figure, the latter from the third. For example let stand for
46     II, 26|    science: this proof is in the third figure: for it is true of
47     II, 26|       first, the latter from the third figure.~In general if a
48     II, 26|        to these. And we have the third figure: for the particular
49     II, 27|      figure or the second or the third. For example the proof that
50     II, 27|   extreme, but is wider than the third term and not convertible