| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] hypothetically 5 i 41 i.e. 14 identical 50 identity 1 if 869 ignorance 3 | Frequency [« »] 51 follow 51 said 50 bc 50 identical 50 knowledge 50 shall 50 third | Aristotle Prior Analytics IntraText - Concordances identical |
Book, Paragraph
1 I, 13| not to belong" are either identical or follow from one another; 2 I, 13| belong", will either be identical or follow from one another. 3 I, 13| affirmations: for the proof is identical. And such premisses are 4 I, 28| for if any of these are identical, the attribute in question 5 I, 28| members of these groups are identical, one of the terms in question 6 I, 28| of these two groups are identical, it follows that one of 7 I, 28| one of the Cs should be identical with one of the Fs, A must 8 I, 28| to all E. If C and G are identical, A must belong to some of 9 I, 28| follows all G. If F and D are identical, A will belong to none of 10 I, 28| is convertible, and F is identical with D, A will belong to 11 I, 28| E. Again, if B and H are identical, A will belong to none of 12 I, 28| for it was assumed to be identical with H, and H belonged to 13 I, 28| of the Es. If D and G are identical, A will not belong to some 14 I, 28| some of the Es. If B is identical with G, there will be a 15 I, 28| B (for B was found to be identical with G): but that A should 16 I, 28| belongs to all E, whenever an identical term is found among the 17 I, 28| to no E, when D and F are identical. Thus we have both the first 18 I, 28| E, whenever D and G are identical. This is the last figure: 19 I, 28| the terms in question are identical, or if the antecedents of 20 I, 28| the antecedents of A are identical with those attributes which 21 I, 28| if those attributes are identical which cannot belong to either 22 I, 28| For if the consequents are identical, e.g. B and F, we have the 23 I, 28| the antecedents of A are identical with attributes which cannot 24 I, 28| belong to either term are identical, e.g. C and H, both premisses 25 I, 28| terms in this inquiry are identical, not which are different 26 I, 28| must be not diverse but identical. Secondly, wherever it happens 27 I, 28| Consequently B must be identical with one of the Hs. Again, 28 I, 28| Consequently B must be identical with some of the Hs. For 29 I, 28| from the fact that B is identical with some of the Hs: for 30 I, 28| are contraries B must be identical with one of the Hs, and 31 I, 29| Cs and the Gs should be identical, but E should be assumed 32 I, 29| Ds and the Gs should be identical, but E should be predicated 33 I, 33| rate. This argument then is identical with the former; for it 34 I, 38| predicate B of C. For justice is identical with a good. In this way 35 I, 39| that the opinable is not identical with a particular kind of 36 I, 40| pleasure is the good" are not identical, we must not set out the 37 I, 46| and "to be not-this" are identical or different in meaning, 38 I, 46| good: and not-good is not identical with "neither good nor not-good". 39 II, 5 | premiss "B belongs to no A" is identical with the premiss "A belongs 40 II, 11| demonstration of both will be identical.~It is clear then that not 41 II, 14| For the syllogisms become identical with those which are obtained 42 II, 15| such that they are either identical or related as whole to part. 43 II, 15| terms presupposed are either identical or related as whole and 44 II, 16| related to C that they are identical, or if they are plainly 45 II, 16| If however A and B are identical either because they are 46 II, 16| because predicates which are identical belong to the same subject, 47 II, 16| belongs to subjects which are identical, the question may be begged 48 II, 16| question is begged when identical predicates are denied of 49 II, 21| Since then he thinks B and C identical, he will think that C is 50 II, 27| probability and a sign are not identical, but a probability is a