Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |           good also if the premiss BC should be indefinite, provided
 2      I, 11|        proof will be given also if BC is necessary. For C is convertible
 3      I, 11|          Again let AC be negative, BC affirmative, and let the
 4      I, 11|          be necessary. For suppose BC is affirmative and necessary,
 5      I, 11|         necessary. Let the premiss BC be both particular and necessary,
 6      I, 11|    necessarily. If the proposition BC is converted the first figure
 7      I, 14|        assumed, but if the premiss BC is converted after the manner
 8      I, 15|          negative, and the premiss BC is affirmative, the former
 9      I, 15|             but if the proposition BC is converted and it is assumed
10      I, 15|         some C. For if the premiss BC is converted in respect
11      I, 16|           negative syllogism, e.g. BC the minor premiss, or the
12      I, 20|       Similarly if the proposition BC is universal. Likewise also
13      I, 20|      negative, and the proposition BC affirmative: for we shall
14      I, 21|          all C. If the proposition BC is converted, we shall have
15      I, 21|       Similarly if the proposition BC is pure, AC problematic;
16      I, 21| problematic; or if AC is negative, BC affirmative, no matter which
17      I, 21|           But if the minor premiss BC is negative, or if both
18      I, 22|           given if the proposition BC is necessary, and AC is
19      I, 22|            affirmative proposition BC is converted, we shall have
20      I, 45|           C: convert the statement BC and both premisses will
21     II, 2 |           true, but if the premiss BC is wholly false, a true
22     II, 2 |         all C. If then the premiss BC which I take is true, and
23     II, 2 |         but while the true premiss BC is assumed, the wholly false
24     II, 2 |       wholly true, and the premiss BC is wholly false, a true
25     II, 2 |         true, although the premiss BC is wholly false. Similarly
26     II, 2 |              6) And if the premiss BC is not wholly false but
27     II, 2 |           some C, then the premiss BC is wholly false, the premiss
28     II, 2 |          wholly false, the premiss BC true, and the conclusion
29     II, 2 |       partially false, the premiss BC will be true, and the conclusion
30     II, 2 |           is true, and the premiss BC is false, the conclusion
31     II, 2 |             although the statement BC is false. Similarly if the
32     II, 2 |            AB is true, the premiss BC false.~(10) Also if the
33     II, 2 |   partially false, and the premiss BC is false too, the conclusion
34     II, 4 |           to C at all, the premiss BC will be wholly true, the
35     II, 4 |         Similarly if the statement BC is false, the statement
36     II, 4 |            to every C, the premiss BC is wholly true, the premiss
37     II, 4 |            whole of C, the premiss BC is wholly true, the premiss
38     II, 4 |   premisses assumed AC is true and BC partly false, a true conclusion
39     II, 4 |       wholly true, and the premiss BC partly false, it is possible
40     II, 4 |       wholly true, and the premiss BC is partly false.~(5) It
41     II, 5 |         conclusion and the premiss BC converted, and similarly
42     II, 5 |          similarly the proposition BC through the conclusion and
43     II, 6 |           all C: the conclusion is BC. If then it is assumed that
44     II, 9 |            and to no C: conclusion BC. If then it is assumed that
45     II, 9 |        last. But if the conclusion BC is converted into its contradictory,
46     II, 9 |          some C: the conclusion is BC. If then it is assumed that
47     II, 10|         does not belong to some B, BC being affirmative, AC being
48     II, 25|    knowledge. If now the statement BC is equally or more probable
49     II, 25|        near to knowledge. But when BC is not more probable than
50     II, 25|           again when the statement BC is immediate: for such a