Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |         Nor again can syllogism be formed when neither the first term
 2      I, 5 |        first figure has again been formed. But since the negative
 3      I, 5 |           then that a syllogism is formed when the terms are so related,
 4      I, 5 |        then that if a syllogism is formed when the terms are universally
 5      I, 5 |            a syllogism can, not be formed anyhow. Nor is one possible
 6      I, 7 |           ways the first figure is formed: if they are made perfect
 7      I, 11|           The first figure then is formed. A similar proof will be
 8      I, 11|      converted the first figure is formed, and the universal premiss
 9      I, 15|          all B: for a syllogism is formed in the third degree. But
10      I, 16|      necessary no syllogism can be formed. Nor again when both premisses
11      I, 18|         affirmative a syllogism is formed to prove that B may belong
12      I, 19|            syllogism can always be formed by converting the problematic
13      I, 19|    particular, no syllogism can be formed. The same proof will serve,
14      I, 20|    particular, no syllogism can be formed: for A must belong sometimes
15      I, 22|      necessary no syllogism can be formed. For A sometimes necessarily
16      I, 22|     problematic a syllogism can be formed by means of conversion;
17      I, 22|         and how a syllogism can be formed, and when the conclusion
18      I, 23|            that every syllogism is formed through one or other of
19      I, 23|         prevents a syllogism being formed, but it will not be in relation
20      I, 23|            every syllogism must be formed by means of the three figures
21      I, 24|           perfect syllogism can be formed; and that if a syllogism
22      I, 24|         and that if a syllogism is formed the terms must be arranged
23      I, 25|      proved that if a syllogism is formed some of its terms must be
24      I, 28|             So the first figure is formed. And A will belong to some
25      I, 28|         taken, a syllogism will be formed to prove that A belongs
26      I, 29|          syllogisms; they also are formed by means of the consequents
27      I, 29|         that all syllogisms can be formed in this way, but also that
28      I, 29|           also that they cannot be formed in any other. For every
29      I, 29|    syllogism has been proved to be formed through one of the aforementioned
30      I, 29| Consequently a syllogism cannot be formed by means of other terms.~
31      I, 31|     through which the syllogism is formed must always be inferior
32      I, 31|        elements demonstrations are formed and in what manner, and
33      I, 41|           and so no syllogism a is formed. We (I mean the learner)
34      I, 44|         hypothetical arguments are formed: but at present this much
35      I, 45|           that the third figure is formed. Similarly if the syllogism
36     II, 1 |        when and how a syllogism is formed; further what we must look
37     II, 7 |       other way can a syllogism be formed.~It is clear then that in
38     II, 10|          to all C, no syllogism is formed about A and C. Nor if A
39     II, 10|          figure the syllogisms are formed through the middle and the
40     II, 11|         after a syllogism has been formed and both the premisses have
41     II, 12|          all the syllogisms can be formed in the middle figure.~
42     II, 13|          Similarly they can all be formed in the last figure. Suppose
43     II, 14|          Whenever the syllogism is formed in the first figure, the
44     II, 14|          Whenever the syllogism is formed in the middle figure, the
45     II, 14|          Whenever the syllogism is formed in the last figure, the
46     II, 20|            when a syllogism can be formed and how its terms must be
47     II, 23|       demonstrative syllogisms are formed by means of the aforesaid
48     II, 27|            way then syllogisms are formed, only that which proceeds
49     II, 27|           a syllogism can never be formed when the terms are related