Book, Paragraph

 1     II, 2 | indifferently, if it is taken as wholly false: but if the premiss
 2     II, 2 |          premiss is not taken as wholly false, it does not matter
 3     II, 2 |        when the first premiss is wholly false, e.g. AB, the conclusion
 4     II, 2 |         but if the premiss BC is wholly false, a true conclusion
 5     II, 2 |          be possible. I mean by "wholly false" the contrary of the
 6     II, 2 |      true, and the premiss AB is wholly false, viz. that A belongs
 7     II, 2 |       premiss BC is assumed, the wholly false premiss AB is also
 8     II, 2 |        when the first premiss is wholly false, whether affirmative
 9     II, 2 |        But if the premiss is not wholly false, a true conclusion
10     II, 2 |         AB, which is assumed, is wholly true, and the premiss BC
11     II, 2 |      true, and the premiss BC is wholly false, a true syllogism
12     II, 2 |       although the premiss BC is wholly false. Similarly if the
13     II, 2 |         if the premiss BC is not wholly false but in part only,
14     II, 2 |        when the first premiss is wholly false, and the other true,
15     II, 2 |           then the premiss BC is wholly false, the premiss BC true,
16     II, 2 |       although the premiss AB is wholly false. (If the premiss AB
17     II, 3 |          when both premisses are wholly false; when each is partially
18     II, 3 |      when one is true, the other wholly false (it does not matter
19     II, 3 |       partially false; if one is wholly false, the other partially
20     II, 3 |         though the premisses are wholly false they will yield a
21     II, 3 |          Again if one premiss is wholly false, the other wholly
22     II, 3 |          wholly false, the other wholly true: for nothing prevents
23     II, 3 |          the one premiss will be wholly false, the other wholly
24     II, 3 |          wholly false, the other wholly true, and the conclusion
25     II, 3 |       partially false, the other wholly true. For it is possible
26     II, 3 |  partially false, the premiss AC wholly true, and the conclusion
27     II, 3 |    partially false, the negative wholly true, a true conclusion
28     II, 3 |         false, the premiss AC is wholly true, and the conclusion
29     II, 3 |         the universal premiss is wholly false, the particular premiss
30     II, 3 |         AB which is universal is wholly false, the premiss AC is
31     II, 4 |          when both premisses are wholly false, when each is partly
32     II, 4 |       false, when one premiss is wholly true, the other false, when
33     II, 4 |          partly false, the other wholly true, and vice versa, and
34     II, 4 |         C, the premisses will be wholly false, but the conclusion
35     II, 4 |         the premisses assumed is wholly false, the other wholly
36     II, 4 |          wholly false, the other wholly true. For it is possible
37     II, 4 |           the premiss BC will be wholly true, the premiss AC wholly
38     II, 4 |      wholly true, the premiss AC wholly false, and the conclusion
39     II, 4 |       every C, the premiss BC is wholly true, the premiss AC is
40     II, 4 |          true, the premiss AC is wholly false, and the conclusion
41     II, 4 |          Again if one premiss is wholly true, the other partly false,
42     II, 4 |          of C, the premiss BC is wholly true, the premiss AC partly
43     II, 4 |         false, the other premiss wholly true, and the conclusion
44     II, 4 |        that if the premiss AC is wholly true, and the premiss BC
45     II, 4 |         all C, the premiss AC is wholly true, and the premiss BC
46     II, 21|          one syllogism is either wholly or partially contrary to
47     II, 21|       belongs, these beliefs are wholly or partially contrary. In