Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 15|           Likewise if the premiss AB is negative, and the premiss
 2      I, 15|       time.~Again let the premiss AB be universal and negative,
 3      I, 15|          true) and if the premiss AB remains as before, we shall
 4      I, 15|       anyhow, whether the premiss AB is negative or affirmative.
 5      I, 16|       affirmative syllogism, e.g. AB the major premiss, is necessary,
 6      I, 25|       terms, e.g. the proposition AB by means of the middle terms
 7      I, 33|         required that the premiss AB should be stated universally.
 8      I, 35|          term for the proposition AB, although it is demonstrable.
 9      I, 45|          all C: for the statement AB does not admit of conversion,
10     II, 1 |            e.g. if the conclusion AB is proved through C, whatever
11     II, 2 |     premiss is wholly false, e.g. AB, the conclusion will not
12     II, 2 |          is true, and the premiss AB is wholly false, viz. that
13     II, 2 |          the wholly false premiss AB is also assumed, viz. that
14     II, 2 |        Similarly if the statement AB is negative. For it is possible
15     II, 2 |             5) But if the premiss AB, which is assumed, is wholly
16     II, 2 |          Similarly if the premiss AB is negative. For it is possible
17     II, 2 |          Similarly if the premiss AB is negative. For it is possible
18     II, 2 |          Similarly if the premiss AB is negative: for it is possible
19     II, 2 |         true although the premiss AB is wholly false. (If the
20     II, 2 |     wholly false. (If the premiss AB is false in part, the conclusion
21     II, 2 |          to some C, the a premiss AB will be partially false,
22     II, 2 |          Similarly if the premiss AB is negative. For the same
23     II, 2 |           9) Again if the premiss AB is true, and the premiss
24     II, 2 |          Similarly if the premiss AB is negative. For it is possible
25     II, 2 |          is true. And the premiss AB is true, the premiss BC
26     II, 2 |           10) Also if the premiss AB is partially false, and
27     II, 2 |          Similarly if the premiss AB is negative: for the same
28     II, 2 |     Similarly also if the premiss AB is negative. For nothing
29     II, 3 |           whole of C, the premiss AB is partially false, the
30     II, 3 |          but to no C, the premiss AB is partially false, the
31     II, 3 |          Similarly if the premiss AB is affirmative: for it is
32     II, 3 |        not to some C, the premiss AB which is universal is wholly
33     II, 5 |         and again the proposition AB through the conclusion and
34     II, 5 |        conclusion and the premiss AB converted. But it is necessary
35     II, 5 |     belongs to C, the proposition AB must no longer be converted
36     II, 5 |       premiss, if the proposition AB is converted as in the universal
37     II, 6 |        middle. But if the premiss AB was negative, and the other
38     II, 6 | demonstrated by the conversion of AB: for it turns out that either
39     II, 7 |       conclusion is the statement AB. If then it is assumed that
40     II, 8 |          C. The universal premiss AB cannot be affected by a
41     II, 9 |        all C, and the proposition AB stands, A will belong to
42     II, 9 |        contradictory, the premiss AB will be refuted as before,
43     II, 9 |         some C, and the statement AB stands, the conclusion will
44     II, 9 |      Consequently the proposition AB is not refuted. But if the