Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 13|          which we deny or on the contrary affirm possibility. For
 2      I, 28|       not which are different or contrary, first because the object
 3      I, 31|     extremes. But division has a contrary intention: for it takes
 4      I, 36|       and B for things which are contrary to one another. Then A belongs
 5      I, 36|      that has a quality, or is a contrary, and the good both is a
 6      I, 36|           and the good both is a contrary and has a quality, the conclusion
 7      I, 36|      which has a quality or is a contrary, though the good is both
 8     II, 2 |       mean by "wholly false" the contrary of the truth, e.g. if what
 9     II, 2 |        to no C, e.g. if B is the contrary of C, and both are accidents
10     II, 8 |        contradictory or into its contrary. For the same syllogism
11     II, 8 |        to some" to "to none"; by contrary opposition I mean the opposition
12     II, 8 |         it is converted into its contrary, neither. For the result
13     II, 8 | conclusion is converted into its contrary. For if A does not belong
14     II, 9 |        by establishing something contrary to it, whichever form the
15     II, 9 |  syllogism is converted into its contrary, the conclusion of the refutation
16     II, 9 |       the refutation will be the contrary of the minor premiss of
17     II, 9 | conclusion is converted into its contrary neither premiss can be refuted,
18     II, 10| conclusion is converted into its contrary, neither of the premisses
19     II, 10|          made. Whenever then the contrary of the conclusion is assumed
20     II, 10|         converted; when a result contrary to the premiss, and when
21     II, 11|     conclusion be drawn when the contrary of the conclusion is supposed,
22     II, 11|         will be possible. If the contrary is supposed, we shall have
23     II, 11|          clear then that not the contrary but the contradictory ought
24     II, 11|          it suit to maintain the contrary: for it is not necessary
25     II, 12|     belongs to all B. But if the contrary is supposed, we shall have
26     II, 13|        is not proved: for if the contrary is supposed, we shall have
27     II, 15|       science, The premisses are contrary if the terms are taken universally;
28     II, 15|          the syllogism is always contrary to the fact, e.g. if a thing
29     II, 15|       premisses should be really contrary.~
30     II, 20|          if what is laid down is contrary to the conclusion, a refutation
31     II, 21|       either wholly or partially contrary to the first premiss of
32     II, 21|          are wholly or partially contrary. In this way then it is
33     II, 21|        his knowledge will not be contrary to his ignorance. The argument
34     II, 21|     knowledge and error that are contrary to one another: rather we
35     II, 21|        of the middle term is not contrary to the knowledge obtained
36     II, 21|       respect of one middle term contrary to that in respect of the
37     II, 21|  knowledge and his error are not contrary. And this happens also to
38     II, 21|          thought caused an error contrary to his knowledge: for the
39     II, 21|         knowledge: for the error contrary to the knowledge of the
40     II, 26|        An objection is a premiss contrary to a premiss. It differs
41     II, 26|          is possible to draw the contrary conclusion are what we start