Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |           WE must first state the subject of our inquiry and the faculty
 2      I, 1 |          to which it belongs: its subject is demonstration and the
 3      I, 1 |       whenever no instance of the subject can be found of which the
 4      I, 4 |        other in part only, to its subject, there must be a perfect
 5      I, 4 |          if both the relations of subject and predicate are particular,
 6      I, 5 |       thing belongs to all of one subject, and to none of another,
 7      I, 5 |        another, or to all of each subject or to none of either, I
 8      I, 5 |      middle belongs to all of one subject and to none of another (
 9      I, 8 |      exposition" of a part of the subject of the particular negative
10      I, 13|  expression "A is possible of the subject of B" means that it is possible
11      I, 13|         say, A is possible of the subject of B, or all B admits of
12      I, 13|           if B is possible of the subject of C, and A is possible
13      I, 13|          and A is possible of the subject of B. For thus both premisses
14      I, 15|         belong to any part of the subject (for this is the contradictory
15      I, 17|    predicate cannot belong to the subject. Suppose the conclusion
16      I, 24|          it will not refer to the subject proposed, or the original
17      I, 24|         it is not relevant to the subject proposed; if it is this
18      I, 27|        first we must lay down the subject and the definitions and
19      I, 27|        those attributes which the subject follows as wholes, for the
20      I, 27|        mark "every". Whenever the subject, for which we must obtain
21      I, 27|        which are peculiar to each subject. For some things are peculiar
22      I, 28|       question must belong to the subject originally in question.
23      I, 28|        must belong to some of the subject in question. Whenever the
24      I, 28|         to the consequents of the subject, and to those attributes
25      I, 28|        possibly be present in the subject, and to the consequents
26      I, 28|           find antecedents of the subject in question and attributes
27      I, 28|        aforesaid relations of the subject and predicate in question:
28      I, 30|   principles which belong to each subject. I mean for example that
29      I, 31|      which ought to have been the subject of demonstration and the
30      I, 31|       this is man or whatever the subject of inquiry may be: for they
31      I, 32|         term is a predicate and a subject of predication, or if it
32     II, 1 |    principles appropriate to each subject. Since some syllogisms are
33     II, 2 |       terms, and two relations of subject and predicate or premisses.
34     II, 15|        same predicate of the same subject, and the middle term in
35     II, 16|      identical belong to the same subject, or because the same predicate
36     II, 16| predicates are denied of the same subject; and both premisses do not
37     II, 17|           with that term which is subject in the hypothesis: for if
38     II, 21|           belong to more than one subject immediately, but although
39     II, 26|       which embraces the original subject becomes the middle term.~
40     II, 26|           relatively to which the subject of his opponent’s premiss