Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 23|           impossible by means of an hypothesis conceded at the beginning.
 2      I, 23|            concession or some other hypothesis. But if this is true, every
 3      I, 29|             with the addition of an hypothesis. For if the Cs and the Gs
 4      I, 44|            a syllogism, but from an hypothesis. This argument cannot be
 5      I, 44|    syllogism: but the former was an hypothesis.~The same holds good of
 6      I, 44|       conclusion is reached from an hypothesis. But these differ from the
 7      I, 44|        conclusion by the help of an hypothesis; these we ought to consider
 8     II, 11|        which is impossible, but the hypothesis is not refuted. Therefore
 9     II, 11|             this is impossible, the hypothesis is false. Similarly if the
10     II, 11|           nothing is proved. If the hypothesis is that A belongs not to
11     II, 11|            does not result from the hypothesis: for then the hypothesis
12     II, 11|            hypothesis: for then the hypothesis would be false, since it
13     II, 12|            all B): consequently the hypothesis is false. It is true then
14     II, 12|             all B, consequently the hypothesis is false: A then will belong
15     II, 13|             belongs to some B, this hypothesis must be made. If A belongs
16     II, 13|             is not proved.~But this hypothesis must be made if we are prove
17     II, 14|          the first figure. Then the hypothesis must have been that A belongs
18     II, 14|            belong to all B. For the hypothesis is that A belongs to all
19     II, 14|            A belongs to some B. The hypothesis here is that is that A belongs
20     II, 14|          belongs to all B. Then the hypothesis must have been that A belongs
21     II, 14|          belongs to some B: for the hypothesis then must have been that
22     II, 14|          syllogism is negative, the hypothesis must have been that A belongs
23     II, 14|          infer in the same way. The hypothesis is that A belongs to all
24     II, 14|          belongs to all B. Then the hypothesis must have been that A belongs
25     II, 14|         particular proposition: the hypothesis then must have been that
26     II, 14|          syllogism is negative, the hypothesis must have been that A belongs
27     II, 14| demonstration is not universal. The hypothesis will then be that A belongs
28     II, 15|     prevents a contradiction to the hypothesis from resulting, e.g. if
29     II, 15|         result that contradicts our hypothesis. But we must recognize that
30     II, 17|  impossibile, and when the original hypothesis is so related to the impossible
31     II, 17|           indifferently whether the hypothesis is made or not. The most
32     II, 17|    conclusion is independent of the hypothesis, as we have explained in
33     II, 17|    conclusion is connected with the hypothesis, but does not result from
34     II, 17|          not depend on the original hypothesis. Or again trace the connexion
35     II, 17|         result, though the original hypothesis were eliminated. But the
36     II, 17|           way it will depend on the hypothesis, e.g. when one traces the
37     II, 17|           which is predicate in the hypothesis: for if it is impossible
38     II, 17|             which is subject in the hypothesis: for if it is impossible