Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 5 |         negative syllogism must result whenever the middle term
 2      I, 5 |       belong to some O: for the result is reached by means of the
 3      I, 7 |       proper syllogism does not result, if both the terms are affirmative
 4      I, 8 |      syllogism will or will not result alike in both cases, the
 5      I, 9 |        For if it were, it would result both through the first figure
 6      I, 10|         falls under A. The same result would be obtained if the
 7      I, 10|      either. Therefore the same result will obtain here. Further,
 8      I, 14|        clear syllogism does not result from the assumed premisses,
 9      I, 15|         that perfect syllogisms result if the minor premiss states
10      I, 15|        but that syllogisms will result if the modality of the premisses
11      I, 15|         by B, it would not only result that if A is necessary B
12      I, 17|    conversion no syllogism will result: for the major premiss,
13      I, 20|     negative the syllogism will result in a negative assertoric
14      I, 22|         first figure, so that a result which follows in the first
15      I, 35|    Sometimes too fallacies will result from such a search, e.g.
16      I, 46|        which C follows: it will result that B belongs necessarily
17     II, 1 |   syllogisms give more than one result, and of particular syllogisms
18     II, 1 |        consequently it does not result through the syllogism that
19     II, 1 |        for a syllogism does not result when this premiss is particular),
20     II, 2 |    something should necessarily result. For that is not possible.
21     II, 5 |       conclusion as before will result: but it must be different.
22     II, 5 |   premiss is converted: for the result is that both premisses are
23     II, 8 |         same syllogism does not result whichever form the conversion
24     II, 8 |      contrary, neither. For the result is no longer, as in the
25     II, 10| conclusion is converted; when a result contrary to the premiss,
26     II, 10|         the premiss, and when a result contradictory to the premiss,
27     II, 11|         the impossible does not result from the hypothesis: for
28     II, 12|    shall have a syllogism and a result which is impossible: but
29     II, 13|          we shall have the same result as before.~It is clear then
30     II, 15|        premisses we shall get a result that contradicts our hypothesis.
31     II, 17|       is not the reason why the result is false", which we frequently
32     II, 17|        hypothesis, but does not result from it. This may happen
33     II, 17|     impossible conclusion would result, though the original hypothesis
34     II, 17|       conclusion will no longer result after A has been eliminated.
35     II, 17|       false conclusion does not result on account of the assumption.
36     II, 17|         the impossibility would result; but rather we mean that
37     II, 17|      absurd that the same false result should follow from several