Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 3 |             all convert in a manner similar to those described. For
 2      I, 4 |           negative minor premiss. A similar proof may also be given
 3      I, 5 |            but if the premisses are similar in form, I mean both negative
 4      I, 5 |          whenever the premisses are similar in form, and one is universal,
 5      I, 10|    necessary without qualification.~Similar results will obtain also
 6      I, 11|            figure then is formed. A similar proof will be given also
 7      I, 12|          that one premiss should be similar to the conclusion. I mean
 8      I, 12|          the conclusion. I mean by "similar", if the conclusion is a
 9      I, 13|            from premisses which are similar in form, as in the other
10      I, 16|            if the premisses are not similar in quality, suppose first
11      I, 16|       syllogism results or not from similar relations of the terms whether
12      I, 17|           syllogism then results. A similar proof can be given if the
13      I, 19|             it may belong to all. A similar proof can be given if the
14      I, 19|            syllogism is possible. A similar proof is possible if the
15      I, 19|            But if the premisses are similar in quality, when they are
16      I, 19|             is not possible at all.~Similar relations will obtain in
17      I, 22|     resulted in the first figure. A similar proof may be given if the
18      I, 22|             sleep-waking horse-man.~Similar results will obtain if one
19      I, 29|          impossible conclusions are similar to ostensive syllogisms;
20      I, 34|          the fallacy may occur in a similar way in the middle figure: "
21      I, 45|    universal we must take them in a similar way. Let B belong to all
22      I, 46|             to "he can not-walk" is similar to the relation of "it is
23      I, 46|           negation may be true in a similar way, viz. that all are not
24      I, 46|             it is true" stands on a similar footing to "it is". For
25     II, 2 |      conclusion will be true. (2) A similar proof may be given if each
26     II, 9 |          can be refuted in a manner similar to the conversion: I mean,
27     II, 9 |             of the minor premiss. A similar proof can be given if the
28     II, 10|           possible about B and C. A similar proof can be given if the
29     II, 10|      supposed to belong to all C. A similar proof is possible if the
30     II, 16|        question indifferently (in a similar way the question may be
31     II, 21|            An error of this kind is similar to the error into which
32     II, 21| recollection may be criticized in a similar way. For it never happens
33     II, 24|            of this is obtained from similar cases, e.g. that the war
34     II, 24|       should be produced by several similar cases. Clearly then to argue