Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |          in a whole, and what we mean by predicating one term
 2      I, 1 |       indefinite. By universal I mean the statement that something
 3      I, 1 | necessity from their being so. I mean by the last phrase that
 4      I, 4 |        the middle. By extremes I mean both that term which is
 5      I, 4 |        already explained what we mean by "predicated of all".
 6      I, 5 |           by middle term in it I mean that which is predicated
 7      I, 5 |        by "an opposite manner" I mean, if the universal statement
 8      I, 5 | premisses are similar in form, I mean both negative or both affirmative,
 9      I, 6 |           by middle term in it I mean that of which both the predicates
10      I, 6 |        predicated, by extremes I mean the predicates, by the major
11      I, 12|     similar to the conclusion. I mean by "similar", if the conclusion
12      I, 13|  convertible into one another. I mean not that the affirmative
13      I, 13|        in two senses: "that" may mean either that to which "that"
14      I, 24|        be like the conclusion. I mean not only in being affirmative
15      I, 26|          means of one another, I mean, universal statements by
16      I, 29|       hypothetical syllogisms, I mean those which proceed by substitution,
17      I, 30|        belong to each subject. I mean for example that astronomical
18      I, 35|      establish that which has no mean. Let A stand for two right
19      I, 36|         to this" does not always mean that "this is not that",
20      I, 38|    extreme, not to the middle. I mean for example that if a syllogism
21      I, 41|     syllogism a is formed. We (I mean the learner) use the process
22      I, 46|      not-white". For they do not mean the same thing, nor is "
23      I, 46| not-white" and "it is not white" mean different things, and one
24     II, 2 |   conclusion will be possible. I mean by "wholly false" the contrary
25     II, 4 |   not-being of the same thing. I mean, for example, that it is
26     II, 8 |       contradictory opposition I mean the opposition of "to all"
27     II, 8 |         by contrary opposition I mean the opposition of "to all"
28     II, 9 |     similar to the conversion: I mean, if the conclusion of the
29     II, 17|      would result; but rather we mean that when the first assumption
30     II, 20|        answers alternate (one, I mean, being affirmative, the
31     II, 21|          in three senses: it may mean either to have knowledge
32     II, 25|               25~By reduction we mean an argument in which the