Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |          belongs: its subject is demonstration and the faculty that carries
 2      I, 4 |    subsequently we must speak of demonstration. Syllogism should be discussed
 3      I, 4 |       should be discussed before demonstration because syllogism is the
 4      I, 4 |    syllogism is the general: the demonstration is a sort of syllogism,
 5      I, 4 |         not every syllogism is a demonstration.~Whenever three terms are
 6      I, 7 |    second figure. Similarly also demonstration will be possible in the
 7      I, 8 |         particular negative, the demonstration will not take the same form,
 8      I, 11|      also must be necessary. The demonstration is the same as before; for
 9      I, 15|         terms are universal. The demonstration is the same as before. But
10      I, 15|      white-animal-pitch. For the demonstration must be made through the
11      I, 15|        the other assertoric. The demonstration is the same as above. As
12      I, 16|       assertoric conclusion. The demonstration is the same as before. But
13      I, 17|     affirmative or negative. The demonstration can be made by means of
14      I, 21|  syllogism will be possible. The demonstration is the same as was given
15      I, 23|          is necessary that every demonstration and every syllogism should
16      I, 23|       But if this is true, every demonstration and every syllogism must
17      I, 25|          is clear too that every demonstration will proceed through three
18      I, 25|        So it is clear that every demonstration and every syllogism will
19      I, 31|        it was possible to make a demonstration of substance and essence.
20      I, 31|         have been the subject of demonstration and the differentiae. In
21     II, 5 |          circular and reciprocal demonstration possible (if the terms are
22     II, 5 |         also that we use for the demonstration the very thing that is being
23     II, 5 |       use the conclusion for the demonstration.~In negative syllogisms
24     II, 5 | conclusion, and this is circular demonstration, to assume the conclusion
25     II, 11|       have the same meaning, the demonstration of both will be identical.~
26     II, 14|                               14~Demonstration per impossibile differs
27     II, 14|         figure. Similarly if the demonstration establishes a particular
28     II, 14|         figure. Similarly if the demonstration is not universal. The hypothesis
29     II, 16|          of its consequents; for demonstration proceeds from what is more
30     II, 16|       cannot be a principle of a demonstration. If however B is so related
31     II, 16|         not that prevents such a demonstration, not the method of demonstrating.
32     II, 16|        is not yet begged, but no demonstration is made. If however A and