Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |         resolved, i.e. both the predicate and that of which it is
 2      I, 4 |        relations of subject and predicate are particular, either positively
 3      I, 8 |       proposition, to which the predicate does not belong, to make
 4      I, 17|   proved by an example that the predicate cannot belong to the subject.
 5      I, 26|    particulars: for whether the predicate belongs to none or not to
 6      I, 26|       is destroyed, whether the predicate belongs to all or to some:
 7      I, 26|        only-by proving that the predicate belongs either to all or
 8      I, 27| possible to demonstrate another predicate, save as a matter of opinion,
 9      I, 27|         take as subjects of the predicate "animal" what are really
10      I, 27|      are really subjects of the predicate "man". It is necessary indeed,
11      I, 28|      possibly be present in the predicate in question: or conversely
12      I, 28|       to the consequents of the predicate. If any members of these
13      I, 28|   cannot possibly belong to the predicate in question. If any members
14      I, 28|    relations of the subject and predicate in question: for all syllogisms
15      I, 32|       then the middle term is a predicate and a subject of predication,
16      I, 32|      predication, or if it is a predicate, and something else is denied
17      I, 32|         figure: if it both is a predicate and is denied of something,
18      I, 33|       to-morrow". It is true to predicate B of C: for Miccalus is
19      I, 38|      for justice. It is true to predicate A of B. For of the good
20      I, 38|        good. Also it is true to predicate B of C. For justice is identical
21      I, 38|        not be true of C. For to predicate of justice the term "good
22      I, 38|         addition is made to the predicate, the addition must be joined
23      I, 38|       for "good". It is true to predicate A of B: for ex hypothesi
24     II, 1 |       to B or C must accept the predicate A: for if D is included
25     II, 2 |        relations of subject and predicate or premisses. If then it
26     II, 15|        affirm and deny the same predicate of the same subject, and
27     II, 16|    subject, or because the same predicate belongs to subjects which
28     II, 17|         with that term which is predicate in the hypothesis: for if
29     II, 21|       is possible that the same predicate should belong to more than
30     II, 23|         of them, then the other predicate will belong to the predicate
31     II, 23|    predicate will belong to the predicate that is converted. But we