Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 11|         belong to all C, and let AC be necessary. Since then
 2      I, 11|        also to some A.~Again let AC be negative, BC affirmative,
 3      I, 11| affirmative and necessary, while AC is negative and not necessary.
 4      I, 11|      possible. Similarly also if AC should be necessary and
 5      I, 11|           should the proposition AC be both particular and necessary.~
 6      I, 20|          also if the proposition AC is negative, and the proposition
 7      I, 21|          proposition BC is pure, AC problematic; or if AC is
 8      I, 21|      pure, AC problematic; or if AC is negative, BC affirmative,
 9      I, 22| proposition BC is necessary, and AC is problematic. Again suppose
10      I, 24|     should assume that the angle AC is equal to the angle BD,
11     II, 3 |     partially false, the premiss AC wholly true, and the conclusion
12     II, 3 |     partially false, the premiss AC is wholly true, and the
13     II, 3 |        wholly false, the premiss AC is true, and the conclusion
14     II, 4 |         Similarly if the premiss AC is stated as negative. For
15     II, 4 |         wholly true, the premiss AC wholly false, and the conclusion
16     II, 4 |          is false, the statement AC true, the conclusion may
17     II, 4 |         wholly true, the premiss AC is wholly false, and the
18     II, 4 |         Similarly if the premiss AC which is assumed is true:
19     II, 4 |         wholly true, the premiss AC partly false, the conclusion
20     II, 4 |         of the premisses assumed AC is true and BC partly false,
21     II, 4 |        clear that if the premiss AC is wholly true, and the
22     II, 4 |          B to all C, the premiss AC is wholly true, and the
23     II, 5 |          Suppose the proposition AC has been demonstrated through
24     II, 6 |         is negative, the premiss AC will not be demonstrated
25     II, 7 |         to prove the proposition AC, when it is assumed that
26     II, 9 |          as before, the premiss, AC by its contradictory. For
27     II, 10|         B, BC being affirmative, AC being negative: for it was
28     II, 10| premisses are not universal. For AC becomes universal and negative,
29     II, 22|          preferable to the whole AC. But ex hypothesi this is
30     II, 25|    equally or more probable than AC, we have a reduction: for
31     II, 25|        is not more probable than AC, and the intermediate terms