Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 | universal or particular, e.g. "contraries are subjects of the same
 2      I, 17|    negations, whether they are contraries or contradictories, and
 3      I, 28|  syllogism results from taking contraries or terms which cannot belong
 4      I, 28|     moods, e.g. if B and F are contraries or cannot belong to the
 5      I, 28|    results; but if B and F are contraries B must be identical with
 6      I, 34|      ignorance, and in general contraries, may possibly belong to
 7      I, 36|   there is a single science of contraries. Let A stand for "there
 8      I, 36|       B, not in the sense that contraries are the fact of there being
 9      I, 36|       it is true to say of the contraries that there is a single science
10      I, 36|    nominative, e.g. man, good, contraries, not in oblique cases, e.g.
11      I, 36|     e.g. of man, of a good, of contraries, but the premisses ought
12      I, 44|        there is one faculty of contraries, there cannot be one science,
13      I, 44|        not every faculty is of contraries, e.g. of what is healthy
14      I, 44|      is not one faculty of all contraries, but he has not proved that
15      I, 44|    proved to be one faculty of contraries, then contraries fall under
16      I, 44|    faculty of contraries, then contraries fall under the same science;
17      I, 46|       difference between their contraries "he cannot walk" - "he is
18     II, 15|      those which are universal contraries, the universal affirmative
19     II, 15|       oLcontradictories and of contraries. Let A stand for good, let
20     II, 15|        cannot anyhow be either contraries or contradictories.~In the
21     II, 15|     But we must recognize that contraries cannot be inferred from
22     II, 26|        a single science, B for contraries. If a man premises that
23     II, 26|         If a man premises that contraries are subjects of a single
24     II, 26|       of a single science, and contraries are opposites, so that we
25     II, 26|      unknowable) that they are contraries, and it is false that they
26     II, 26|        if a man maintains that contraries are not subjects of a single
27     II, 26|      opposites or that certain contraries, e.g. what is healthy and
28     II, 26|        if a man maintains that contraries are not subjects of the
29     II, 26| subjects of the same science: "contraries" is universal relatively
30     II, 26|      namely the objection from contraries, from similars, and from