| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] positing 2 position 8 positions 3 positive 29 positively 3 posits 1 possess 1 | Frequency [« »] 30 p 29 above 29 per 29 positive 29 prevents 29 say 28 extreme | Aristotle Prior Analytics IntraText - Concordances positive |
Book, Paragraph
1 I, 4 | last. As an example of a positive relation between the extremes 2 I, 4 | whether the major premiss is positive or negative, indefinite 3 I, 4 | is B. As an example of a positive relation between the extremes 4 I, 5 | syllogism. Terms to illustrate a positive relation between the extremes 5 I, 5 | O. Terms to illustrate a positive relation are line, animal, 6 I, 5 | N. Terms to illustrate a positive relation between the extremes 7 I, 5 | or to no O. Terms for the positive relation are white, animal, 8 I, 5 | white, animal, snow; for the positive relation, white, animal, 9 I, 6 | syllogism. Terms for the positive relation are animal, horse, 10 I, 6 | asserted of no S. Terms for the positive relation are animal, horse, 11 I, 6 | syllogism. Terms for the positive relation are animal, man, 12 I, 6 | raven, snow, white. For a positive relation terms cannot be 13 I, 9 | clear that for C also the positive or the negative relation 14 I, 15| instances of a necessary and positive relation we may take the 15 I, 15| and assertoric, whether positive or negative, and the minor 16 I, 15| syllogism. As instances of the positive relation we may take the 17 I, 15| instances of the necessary and positive relation we may take the 18 I, 16| before serve both for the positive relation-white-animal-snow, 19 I, 16| both where the relation is positive and necessary, e.g. animal-white-man, 20 I, 16| animal-white-raven to illustrate the positive relation, or animal-white-pitch 21 I, 16| animal-white-swan to illustrate the positive relation, and animal-white-snow 22 I, 16| either case to illustrate the positive relation are animal-white-man: 23 I, 16| inanimate, is both necessary and positive and necessary and negative. 24 I, 18| both when the relation is positive, e.g. health, animal, man, 25 I, 19| if the relation must be positive when the terms are related 26 I, 31| there is a need to prove a positive statement, the middle term 27 I, 46| terms are similarly related positive ter terms respect of this 28 II, 4 | premisses are universal, positive terms in positive syllogisms, 29 II, 4 | universal, positive terms in positive syllogisms, negative terms