| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] are 480 areas 1 argue 5 argument 27 arguments 14 arise 1 arises 5 | Frequency [« »] 28 extreme 28 refuted 27 about 27 argument 27 assume 27 how 27 sometimes | Aristotle Prior Analytics IntraText - Concordances argument |
Book, Paragraph
1 I, 17| assent to the following argument: "since it is false that 2 I, 17| this is impossible." The argument cannot be admitted, for 3 I, 23| other of these figures. The argument is the same if several middle 4 I, 23| way. For all who effect an argument per impossibile infer syllogistically 5 I, 25| induction or of obscuring the argument or something of the sort.~( 6 I, 25| in whatever syllogistic argument the premisses through which 7 I, 25| not even in number, this argument either has not been drawn 8 I, 32| once in the course of an argument, a syllogism cannot be made: 9 I, 33| false at any rate. This argument then is identical with the 10 I, 38| this way an analysis of the argument can be made. But if the 11 I, 43| term the point to which the argument has been directed, not the 12 I, 44| from an hypothesis. This argument cannot be reduced: but the 13 I, 44| faculty can. The latter argument perhaps was a syllogism: 14 I, 44| though the rest of the argument cannot, because the conclusion 15 I, 45| all C and B to some C, the argument is the same: for B is convertible 16 II, 4 | false, the premisses of the argument must be false, either all 17 II, 17| which we frequently make in argument, is made primarily in the 18 II, 17| the earlier parts of the argument; nor will he use the formula 19 II, 18| 18~A false argument depends on the first false 20 II, 18| be false, and on this the argument depends: for A and B are 21 II, 19| how we are maintaining the argument.~That which we urge men 22 II, 21| contrary to his ignorance. The argument in the Meno that learning 23 II, 24| the minor term, whereas argument by example does make this 24 II, 25| By reduction we mean an argument in which the first term 25 II, 25| conclusion; or again an argument in which the terms intermediate 26 II, 26| same science: the former argument issues from the first, the 27 II, 26| figure would require a fuller argument, e.g. if it should not be