Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 5|         but in no other way. Let M be predicated of no N, but
 2      I, 5| convertible, N will belong to no M: but M was assumed to belong
 3      I, 5|         will belong to no M: but M was assumed to belong to
 4      I, 5|    already been proved. Again if M belongs to all N, but to
 5      I, 5|      will belong to no O. For if M belongs to no O, O belongs
 6      I, 5|         to no O, O belongs to no M: but M (as was said) belongs
 7      I, 5|           O belongs to no M: but M (as was said) belongs to
 8      I, 5|          also are needed.~But if M is predicated of every N
 9      I, 5|          syllogism possible when M is predicated neither of
10      I, 5|   particular is negative. For if M belongs to no N, but to
11      I, 5| convertible, N will belong to no M: but M was admitted to belong
12      I, 5|         will belong to no M: but M was admitted to belong to
13      I, 5|       the first figure. Again if M belongs to all N, but not
14      I, 5|          N belongs to all O, and M is predicated also of all
15      I, 5|        predicated also of all N, M must belong to all O: but
16      I, 5|       all O: but we assumed that M does not belong to some
17      I, 5|         belong to some O. And if M belongs to all N but not
18      I, 5|        same as the above. But if M is predicated of all O,
19      I, 5|       there be a conclusion when M is predicated of no O, but
20      I, 5|   premiss be universal, e.g. let M belong to no N, and not
21      I, 5|   positively and universally, if M belongs to some O, and does
22      I, 5|         N belonged to all O, but M to no N, then M would belong
23      I, 5|       all O, but M to no N, then M would belong to no O: but
24      I, 5|        For since it is true that M does not belong to some
25      I, 5|    before be universal, e.g. let M belong to all N and to some
26      I, 5|        premiss is universal, and M belongs to no O, and not