Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 5 |        I call such a figure the second; by middle term in it I
 2      I, 7 |      first figure. Those in the second figure are clearly made
 3      I, 7 |      prove them by means of the second figure, reducing them ad
 4      I, 7 |         we know by means of the second figure. Similarly also demonstration
 5      I, 10|                       10~In the second figure, if the negative
 6      I, 14|    proof of the first or of the second. For the affirmative is
 7      I, 14|       case, an imperfect in the second. But possibility must be
 8      I, 17|                       17~In the second figure whenever both premisses
 9      I, 26|    first figure and through the second, through the first in one
10      I, 26|        in one mood, through the second in two. The particular affirmative
11      I, 26|      first, in two moods in the second, in three moods in the third.
12      I, 28|    sometimes a syllogism in the second. But if the object is to
13      I, 45|    figure can be reduced to the second, and a syllogism in the
14      I, 45|     universal syllogisms in the second figure can be reduced to
15     II, 1 |   syllogism is negative. In the second figure it will be possible
16     II, 5 | syllogism can be assumed in the second: for if both of them are
17     II, 6 |                        6~In the second figure it is not possible
18     II, 6 |         to no C: for we get the second figure, with B as middle.
19     II, 7 |         is possible through the second figure and through the first,
20     II, 7 |     when particular through the second and the last. In the third
21     II, 9 |                        9~In the second figure it is not possible
22     II, 10|         the last figure. In the second figure syllogisms proceed
23     II, 26|  syllogisms possible, since the second figure cannot produce an
24     II, 26|     negative objection from the second.~
25     II, 27|         the first figure or the second or the third. For example