Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 3 |         possible that man is not horse, or that no garment is white.
 2      I, 3 |      possible for no man to be a horse, it is also admissible for
 3      I, 3 |        is also admissible for no horse to be a man; and if it is
 4      I, 4 |      take the terms animal, man, horse; of a universal negative
 5      I, 4 | syllogism. Take the terms white, horse, swan: white, horse, raven.
 6      I, 4 |       white, horse, swan: white, horse, raven. The same terms may
 7      I, 4 |         above are animal, white, horse: animal, white, stone.~It
 8      I, 6 |    positive relation are animal, horse, man: for the negative relation
 9      I, 6 |    positive relation are animal, horse, inanimate; for the negative
10      I, 6 |       the negative relation man, horse, inanimate-inanimate being
11      I, 11|      animal", let the term C be "horse". It is possible then that
12      I, 11|         good should belong to no horse, and it is necessary that
13      I, 11|    animal should belong to every horse: but it is not necessary
14      I, 15|    moving" is possible for every horse; yet "man" is possible for
15      I, 15|          man" is possible for no horse. Further let the major term
16      I, 17|         Let A be white, B man, C horse. It is possible then for
17      I, 17|         belong, is clear. For no horse is a man. Neither is it
18      I, 17|          it is necessary that no horse should be a man, but the
19      I, 18|        is negative, e.g. health, horse, man.~The same will hold
20     II, 2 |       for animal belongs both to horse and to man, but horse to
21     II, 2 |         to horse and to man, but horse to no man. If then it is
22     II, 3 |         to no stone and to every horse, then if the premisses are
23     II, 3 |          animal belongs to every horse and man, and no man is a
24     II, 3 |         and man, and no man is a horse. If then it is assumed that
25     II, 23|    long-lived animals, e.g. man, horse, mule. A then belongs to