Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 17|        conclusion can always be drawn. Similarly when one premiss
 2      I, 18| assertoric, a conclusion can be drawn by means of conversion,
 3      I, 18|         Nor can a conclusion be drawn when both premisses are
 4      I, 19|   syllogistic conclusion can be drawn, not merely a negative problematic
 5      I, 19|       once more a conclusion is drawn by the first figure that
 6      I, 19|   syllogistic conclusion can be drawn. This can be proved in the
 7      I, 19|     stated, a conclusion can be drawn as above if the problematic
 8      I, 19|  necessary no conclusion can be drawn. It is clear too that a
 9      I, 21|   syllogistic conclusion can be drawn from the premisses as they
10      I, 22|        conclusion can always be drawn; when one proposition is
11      I, 24|         lines A and B have been drawn to the centre. If then one
12      I, 25|    argument either has not been drawn syllogistically or it has
13      I, 25|    terms: for the conclusion is drawn not in relation to the single
14      I, 32|       this has not however been drawn by syllogism from the propositions
15      I, 32|         conclusion has not been drawn syllogistically: for the
16     II, 2 |        a true conclusion may be drawn from false premisses, true
17     II, 2 |        a true conclusion may be drawn, whether both the premisses
18     II, 11|         Nor can a conclusion be drawn when the contrary of the
19     II, 17|      syllogism can no longer be drawn in reference to it. It is
20     II, 17|       false is when a syllogism drawn from middle terms to an
21     II, 18|         the false conclusion is drawn from two premisses, one
22     II, 18|       false syllogism cannot be drawn from two premisses. But
23     II, 19|        avoid having a syllogism drawn against us we must take
24     II, 19|      that a syllogism cannot be drawn without a middle term, and
25     II, 19|         on. If the syllogism is drawn through one middle term,