| Table of Contents | Words: Alphabetical - Frequency - Inverse - Length - Statistics | Help | IntraText Library | ||
| Alphabetical [« »] classes 1 clear 140 clearer 4 clearly 25 cleon 1 closely 1 co-ordinate 1 | Frequency [« »] 27 sometimes 26 know 26 m 25 clearly 25 drawn 25 else 25 example | Aristotle Prior Analytics IntraText - Concordances clearly |
Book, Paragraph
1 I, 5 | have seen) not possible, clearly it will not be possible 2 I, 6 | possible, as has been shown. Clearly then no syllogism will be 3 I, 7 | in the second figure are clearly made perfect by these, though 4 I, 15| A is possible for all B, clearly it is possible for all C 5 I, 15| that any man should move. Clearly then the conclusion establishes 6 I, 15| relation, white-animal-pitch. Clearly then if the terms are universal, 7 I, 16| premisses are affirmative, clearly the conclusion which follows 8 I, 16| may be used for all cases.~Clearly then from what has been 9 I, 17| through the same terms. Clearly then, if both the premisses 10 I, 19| necessarily belongs to no swan; Clearly then we cannot draw a problematic 11 I, 19| that is awake is animal. Clearly then the conclusion cannot 12 I, 19| there cannot be a syllogism. Clearly the conclusion cannot be 13 I, 28| E will belong to all G. Clearly then all syllogisms proceed 14 I, 29| belong to none of the Es. Clearly then we must consider the 15 I, 32| determined in the same way. Clearly then, if the same term is 16 I, 32| particular is described, clearly we must not look for all 17 I, 38| B for being, C for good. Clearly then in syllogisms which 18 I, 42| another through another. Clearly then we must analyse arguments 19 I, 44| to consider and mark out clearly. We shall describe in the 20 I, 46| if it is not a negation clearly it must in a sense be an 21 II, 1 | then D is subordinate to C, clearly B does not belong to it. 22 II, 5 | premiss can be demonstrated. Clearly it is impossible to demonstrate 23 II, 11| does not belong to some B. Clearly then we must suppose the 24 II, 24| by several similar cases. Clearly then to argue by example 25 II, 25| in which the first term clearly belongs to the middle, but