Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 3 |       not convert, for the same reason which we have already stated.~
 2      I, 5 |   affirmative relation, for the reason already stated: the point
 3      I, 15|        of these happens and the reason why. But if one of the relations
 4      I, 27|      follows as wholes, for the reason given. But that which follows
 5      I, 27|      out of such premisses. The reason why this is so will be clear
 6      I, 34|   cannot belong to any man. The reason for this is that the terms
 7      I, 44|       And we have explained the reason.~
 8      I, 46|      but "not to be white". The reason for this is as follows.
 9      I, 46|         everything, e.g. we may reason that "if A and B cannot
10     II, 1 |         all A.~This then is the reason common to all syllogisms
11     II, 1 |        possible to give another reason concerning those which are
12     II, 2 |         to the fact, not to the reason. The reason cannot be established
13     II, 2 |          not to the reason. The reason cannot be established from
14     II, 4 |        is not necessitated. The reason is that when two things
15     II, 5 |      universal premiss, for the reason given above. But it is possible
16     II, 6 |         be proved, for the same reason as we gave above, but the
17     II, 15|     opposite premisses, for the reason given in reference to the
18     II, 16|        many ways. A man may not reason syllogistically at all,
19     II, 16|        turns out that those who reason thus are proving A by means
20     II, 16|        turns out that those who reason thus merely say a particular
21     II, 16| question is begged for the same reason as before. For we have explained
22     II, 17| objection that "this is not the reason why the result is false",
23     II, 19|   opponent asks us to admit the reason without the conclusions,
24     II, 26|     clear immediately. For this reason also this is the only figure