Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 2 |  affirmative, others negative, in respect of each of the three modes
 2      I, 3 | conversion will hold good also in respect of necessary premisses.
 3      I, 3 |           have already stated.~In respect of possible premisses, since
 4      I, 4 |           will be no syllogism in respect of the extremes; for nothing
 5      I, 4 |      universality is posited with respect to the minor term either
 6      I, 8 |          relation is necessary in respect of the part taken, it must
 7      I, 15|        all" with no limitation in respect of time, e.g. to the present
 8      I, 15|     simply, without limitation in respect of time.~Again let the premiss
 9      I, 15|        premiss BC is converted in respect of possibility, a syllogism
10      I, 25|         syllogisms are taken with respect to their main premisses,
11      I, 25|        same arrangement either in respect to the terms or to the premisses.
12      I, 32|        that is true must in every respect agree with itself First
13      I, 34|       conclusion results, save in respect of possibility: but such
14      I, 46|        related positive ter terms respect of this arrangement. Let
15      I, 46|    negations have been assumed in respect to one term.~ ~
16     II, 2 |   premisses, true however only in respect to the fact, not to the
17     II, 9 |       premisses are transposed in respect of their quality.~If the
18     II, 21|        not know the same thing in respect of the same thing. Again
19     II, 21|        stated above. The error in respect of the middle term is not
20     II, 21|  syllogism, nor is the thought in respect of one middle term contrary
21     II, 21|          term contrary to that in respect of the other. Nothing prevents
22     II, 23|     related in conversion, and in respect of being in a higher degree