Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 27|    sometimes say that that white object is Socrates, or that that
 2      I, 28|        in the second. But if the object is to establish a particular
 3      I, 28|      contrary, first because the object of our investigation is
 4      I, 33|   eternal", B "Aristomenes as an object of thought", C "Aristomenes".
 5      I, 33|         B. For Aristomenes as an object of thought is eternal. But
 6      I, 33| Aristomenes is Aristomenes as an object of thought. But A does not
 7      I, 33|      every Aristomenes who is an object of thought is eternal, since
 8      I, 38|    proved that the healthy is an object of knowledge qua good, of
 9      I, 38|        qua good, of goat-stag an object of knowledge qua not existing,
10      I, 38|         or man perishable qua an object of sense: in every case
11      I, 38|          good is proved to be an object of knowledge and when it
12      I, 38|       when it is proved to be an object of knowledge that it is
13      I, 38|         has been proved to be an object of knowledge without qualification,
14      I, 40|        be "the good", but if the object is to prove that pleasure
15     II, 22|     preferable to D. For A is an object of desire to the same extent
16     II, 22|       the same extent as B is an object of aversion, since they
17     II, 22|       opposites. If then A is an object of desire to the same extent
18     II, 22|        same extent as D, B is an object of aversion to the same
19     II, 22|        extent as each-the one an object of aversion, the other an
20     II, 22|        of aversion, the other an object of desire). Therefore both
21     II, 22|           then B must be less an object of aversion than C: for
22     II, 22|          consequently is less an object of aversion than B. If then