Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |          in or from a whole, the extremes must be related by a perfect
 2      I, 4 |          comes in the middle. By extremes I mean both that term which
 3      I, 4 |      syllogism in respect of the extremes; for nothing necessary follows
 4      I, 4 | affirmative relation between the extremes we may take the terms animal,
 5      I, 4 |    positive relation between the extremes take the terms science,
 6      I, 4 |    positive relation between the extremes take the terms good, state,
 7      I, 5 |  predicated of both subjects, by extremes the terms of which this
 8      I, 5 |          term stands outside the extremes, and is first in position.
 9      I, 5 |    positive relation between the extremes are substance, animal, man;
10      I, 5 |        universally to one of the extremes, a particular negative syllogism
11      I, 5 |    positive relation between the extremes are animal, substance, unit:
12      I, 5 |          find terms of which the extremes are related positively and
13      I, 5 |   belongs to some of each of the extremes, or does not belong to some
14      I, 6 |    predicates are predicated, by extremes I mean the predicates, by
15      I, 6 |          term stands outside the extremes, and is last in position.
16      I, 6 |  possible anyhow, if each of the extremes belongs to some of the middle
17      I, 28|        term; A and E will be the extremes. So the first figure is
18      I, 31|      comprehend the first of the extremes. But division has a contrary
19      I, 31|       the universal term, and as extremes that which ought to have
20     II, 15|        is not predicated of both extremes, but one thing is denied
21     II, 22|                  22~Whenever the extremes are convertible it is necessary
22     II, 27|       arguments derived from the extremes signs, that derived from