Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 27|  properly to the choice of what concerns man. One must apprehend
 2      I, 45|       the affirmative statement concerns B, and the negative C, C
 3      I, 45| whenever the negative statement concerns the major extreme, reduction
 4      I, 45|       the affirmative statement concerns the major extreme, no resolution
 5      I, 45|       another the premiss which concerns the minor extreme must be
 6     II, 3 |     term the negative statement concerns.~(3) Also if one premiss
 7     II, 7 |  affirmative, and the universal concerns the minor extreme, proof
 8     II, 7 |        be possible, but when it concerns the other extreme, impossible.
 9     II, 8 |    conversion the premiss which concerns the major extreme: for the
10     II, 9 |        refute the premiss which concerns the major extreme by establishing
11     II, 10|  figures, and the premiss which concerns the minor extreme is alway
12     II, 10|       figure, the premiss which concerns the major through the last
13     II, 10|  figures, and the premiss which concerns the minor extreme is always
14     II, 10|       figure, the premiss which concerns the major extreme through
15     II, 10|      figures; the premiss which concerns the major is always refuted
16     II, 10|       figure, the premiss which concerns the minor through the middle
17     II, 11|        term the assumed premiss concerns; but if it is supposed that
18     II, 11|      But if the premiss assumed concerns B, no syllogism will be
19     II, 11|         the other premiss taken concerns B; we shall have a syllogism
20     II, 11|       the other premiss assumed concerns B. The same results if the
21     II, 11|        the negative proposition concerns B, nothing is proved. If
22     II, 15|   statement concerned B, now it concerns C. Similarly if one premiss