Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |    universality is posited with reference to the major term either
 2      I, 4 |          and particularity with reference to the minor term affirmatively:
 3      I, 8 |        to make the syllogism in reference to this: with terms so chosen
 4      I, 15|      premiss is understood with reference to the present moment, there
 5      I, 23|         premisses with the same reference, and a syllogism relating
 6      I, 23| impossible to take a premiss in reference to B, if we neither affirm
 7      I, 27|         supply of syllogisms in reference to the problem proposed
 8      I, 28|         most universal, e.g. in reference to E we must look to KF
 9      I, 28|         than to F alone, and in reference to A we must look to KC
10      I, 30|         how we must select with reference to everything that is, e.g.
11      I, 34|   figure the fallacy results in reference to possibility. For health
12      I, 36|     ought to be understood with reference to the cases of each term-either
13      I, 43|                           43~In reference to those arguments aiming
14      I, 45|         for B is convertible in reference to C. But if B belongs to
15     II, 8 |       to take both premisses in reference to the minor extreme. Similarly
16     II, 15|         for the reason given in reference to the first figure; but
17     II, 17|       can no longer be drawn in reference to it. It is clear then
18     II, 19|    ought to watch the middle in reference to each conclusion, is evident
19     II, 21|         both the premisses with reference to each of the two middle
20     II, 26|    frame his contradiction with reference to the universal of the
21     II, 26|    frame his contradiction with reference to a term relatively to