Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |      are proved by this figure, viz. universal and particular,
 2      I, 23|      reasoning per impossibile, viz. proving something impossible
 3      I, 44|       diagonal is commensurate, viz. that then odd numbers are
 4      I, 45|        resolved into the first, viz. when the negative statement
 5      I, 46|   something underlying the one, viz. that which is not-equal,
 6      I, 46|        it is not true to say A, viz. that it is a white log.
 7      I, 46|       be true in a similar way, viz. that all are not white
 8     II, 2 |     premiss AB is wholly false, viz. that A belongs to all B,
 9     II, 2 |     premiss AB is also assumed, viz. that A belongs to nothing
10     II, 3 |        universal or particular, viz. when both premisses are
11     II, 4 |        is not, that the former (viz. A) should not be. If then
12     II, 5 |       the converse was assumed, viz. that B belongs to C. Or
13     II, 5 |       in the earlier syllogism, viz. that A belongs to B. In
14     II, 7 |        is not except as before, viz. if it is assumed that that
15     II, 11| concerning either of the terms, viz. that C belongs to all A,
16     II, 15|        opposition are possible, viz. universal affirmative to
17     II, 15|   opposites in the way we said, viz. "all science is good" and "
18     II, 16|        of begging the question, viz. proving that which is not
19     II, 22|        his love would prefer A, viz. that the beloved should
20     II, 25|   intermediate between E and F (viz. that the circle is made