Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 3 |       it is not-good" or "it is not-white" or in a word "it is not-this".
 2      I, 46|         to be white" and "to be not-white". For they do not mean the
 3      I, 46|       same thing, nor is "to be not-white" the negation of "to be
 4      I, 46|          it is white" to "it is not-white"; so is that of "he knows
 5      I, 46|        the expressions "it is a not-white log" and "it is not a white
 6      I, 46|        s truth. For if "it is a not-white log", it must be a log:
 7      I, 46|         is true to say "it is a not-white", it is true also to say "
 8      I, 46|  simultaneously be white and be not-white, or be a not-white log and
 9      I, 46|       and be not-white, or be a not-white log and be a white log;
10      I, 46|         log at all, cannot be a not-white log either. On the other
11      I, 46|        cannot be simultaneously not-white and white, D must belong
12      I, 46|      true to say that it is not not-white. But A is not true of all
13      I, 46|       white, while that each is not-white or all are not-white is
14      I, 46|         is not-white or all are not-white is false. Similarly also "
15      I, 46| Similarly also "every animal is not-white" is not the negation of "
16      I, 46|         it is clear that "it is not-white" and "it is not white" mean
17      I, 46|      that it is true to call it not-white; for this means that it
18      I, 46|       for this means that it is not-white. But we may prove that it
19      I, 46|        true to call it white or not-white in the same way for both
20      I, 46|      not "it is true to call it not-white" but "it is not true to