Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 | particular, e.g. "contraries are subjects of the same science", or "
 2      I, 5 |      which is predicated of both subjects, by extremes the terms of
 3      I, 26|          Since we understand the subjects with which syllogisms are
 4      I, 27|       term follows, e.g. take as subjects of the predicate "animal"
 5      I, 27|          animal" what are really subjects of the predicate "man".
 6      I, 28|     whole, they must look to the subjects of that which is being established (
 7      I, 28|        is being established (the subjects of which it happens to be
 8      I, 28|  predicated. For if any of these subjects is the same as any of these
 9      I, 29|       common term other than the subjects of inquiry, to which the
10      I, 30|       for the attributes and the subjects of both our terms, and we
11     II, 16|        same predicate belongs to subjects which are identical, the
12     II, 26|     premises that contraries are subjects of a single science, the
13     II, 26|         that opposites are never subjects of a single science, and
14     II, 26|       and the unknowable are not subjects of a single science: this
15     II, 26|          false that they are the subjects of a single science.~Similarly
16     II, 26|          that contraries are not subjects of a single science, we
17     II, 26|          and what is sickly, are subjects of the same science: the
18     II, 26|          that contraries are not subjects of the same science, his
19     II, 26|       and the unknowable are not subjects of the same science: "contraries"