Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |     of the same science", or "pleasure is not good". The demonstrative
 2      I, 2 |       convertible, e.g. if no pleasure is good, then no good will
 3      I, 2 |    good, then no good will be pleasure; the terms of the affirmative
 4      I, 2 |    but in part, e.g. if every pleasure,is good, some good must
 5      I, 2 |       good, some good must be pleasure; the particular affirmative
 6      I, 2 |  convert in part (for if some pleasure is good, then some good
 7      I, 2 |        then some good will be pleasure); but the particular negative
 8      I, 24| Suppose we have to prove that pleasure in music is good. If one
 9      I, 24|       claim as a premiss that pleasure is good without adding "
10      I, 24|    one should claim that some pleasure is good, then if it is different
11      I, 24|       if it is different from pleasure in music, it is not relevant
12      I, 24|  proposed; if it is this very pleasure, one is assuming that which
13      I, 36|    but there is a becoming of pleasure: so pleasure is not a becoming."
14      I, 36|      becoming of pleasure: so pleasure is not a becoming." Or again
15      I, 40|     40~Since the expressions "pleasure is good" and "pleasure is
16      I, 40|        pleasure is good" and "pleasure is the good" are not identical,
17      I, 40|    syllogism is to prove that pleasure is the good, the term must
18      I, 40|       object is to prove that pleasure is good, the term will be "