Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 15|          imperfect: for the proof proceeds not from the premisses assumed.
 2      I, 19| assertoric proposition (the proof proceeds by conversion); but when
 3      I, 21|          universal premisses, and proceeds by means of the same terms.~
 4      I, 23|   syllogism relating this to that proceeds through premisses which
 5      I, 26|        premisses through which it proceeds, the relation of the premisses
 6      I, 27|      every man: for the syllogism proceeds through universal premisses.
 7      I, 28|        clear too that the inquiry proceeds through the three terms
 8      I, 29|   establishes a possible relation proceeds through these terms as well.
 9     II, 8 |         for the refutation always proceeds through the third since
10     II, 10|       third figure the refutation proceeds through the first and the
11     II, 16|    consequents; for demonstration proceeds from what is more certain
12     II, 23|        particulars. For induction proceeds through an enumeration of
13     II, 23|         middle term the syllogism proceeds through the middle term;
14     II, 27|           formed, only that which proceeds through the first figure
15     II, 27|         is universal), that which proceeds through the last figure
16     II, 27|           But the syllogism which proceeds through the middle figure