Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |        and the dialectician argue syllogistically after stating that something
 2      I, 23|           then one wants to prove syllogistically A of B, either as an attribute
 3      I, 23|    argument per impossibile infer syllogistically what is false, and prove
 4      I, 23|          commensurate. One infers syllogistically that odd numbers come out
 5      I, 25|         either has not been drawn syllogistically or it has assumed more than
 6      I, 27|          normally are established syllogistically from premisses which obtain
 7      I, 29| ostensively may also be concluded syllogistically per impossibile by means
 8      I, 29|         to establish some of them syllogistically in another way, e.g. universal
 9      I, 31|           it is possible to prove syllogistically by division, nor did they
10      I, 31|          it was possible to prove syllogistically in the manner we have described.
11      I, 31|         ought to have been proved syllogistically. And again, taking A as
12      I, 32|     conclusion has not been drawn syllogistically: for the premisses are not
13     II, 11|    assumed as well we shall prove syllogistically what is false, but not the
14     II, 16|        ways. A man may not reason syllogistically at all, or he may argue
15     II, 23|          consists in establishing syllogistically a relation between one extreme