Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 3 |   longer be converted like the simple negatives; the universal
 2      I, 8 |       manner as in the case of simple predication. But in the
 3      I, 12|        It is clear then that a simple conclusion is not reached
 4      I, 12|      unless both premisses are simple assertions, but a necessary
 5      I, 12|         if the conclusion is a simple assertion, the premiss must
 6      I, 12| assertion, the premiss must be simple; if the conclusion is necessary,
 7      I, 12|       be neither necessary nor simple unless a necessary or simple
 8      I, 12|   simple unless a necessary or simple premiss is assumed.~
 9      I, 13|    differs from the proof of a simple statement. We proceed to
10      I, 13|      is true, one premiss is a simple assertion, the other a problematic.
11      I, 15|         15~If one premiss is a simple proposition, the other a
12      I, 15|   stating possible, the latter simple attribution, a perfect syllogism
13      I, 15|       the minor premiss states simple belonging: but that syllogisms
14      I, 16|    whether we are dealing with simple existence or necessity,
15      I, 37|  qualification, and further as simple or compound: the same holds