Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 5 | admissible to take terms: our point must be proved from the
 2      I, 5 |    reason already stated: the point must be proved from the
 3      I, 6 |       it belongs to no S. Our point, then, must be proved from
 4      I, 10|       used to demonstrate the point, which were used in the
 5      I, 10|  conclusion be necessary. The point can be demonstrated by means
 6      I, 11|       necessary. Further, the point may be made clear by considering
 7      I, 11|     here either. Further, the point is clear if we look at the
 8      I, 13|    these distinctions we next point out that the expression "
 9      I, 17|      as before.~First we must point out that the negative problematic
10      I, 31|    question. First, this very point had escaped all those who
11      I, 43|       must take as a term the point to which the argument has
12      I, 45|    however but some only. The point will be clear in the sequel.
13     II, 2 |       positions, to prove the point.~(9) Again if the premiss
14     II, 21|      man will grant the first point. But presumably that is
15     II, 26|       universal, e.g. he will point out that the knowable and