Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 14| premiss is converted and it is laid down that B possibly may
 2      I, 14|    according to the definition laid down, not as covering necessity.
 3      I, 15|       These propositions being laid down, it is necessary that
 4      I, 16|       C. But it was originally laid down that B is possible
 5      I, 16|   belongs to some C, and it is laid down that A possibly does
 6      I, 16|       can B belong. But it was laid down that B may belong to
 7      I, 19|      negative premiss has been laid down either in the assertoric
 8      I, 29|    syllogism both remisses are laid down in accordance with
 9      I, 32|     results from what has been laid down, e.g. if the assumptions
10      I, 32|       these propositions being laid down, it is necessary that
11     II, 2 |       Let it not, because A is laid down as a single term, be
12     II, 17|       depend on the assumption laid down. For we use the expression "
13     II, 17|       downwards, e.g. if it is laid down that A belongs to B,
14     II, 17|    independent. For if it were laid down that A belongs not
15     II, 20|       consequently, if what is laid down is contrary to the