Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 18|    will belong to no A. But ex hypothesi can belong to all C: so
 2      I, 19|       belong to no A: but A ex hypothesi is capable of belonging
 3      I, 19|      to some of the Cs: but ex hypothesi it may belong to all. A
 4      I, 38|       predicate A of B: for ex hypothesi there is a science of that
 5      I, 38|        that it is good: for ex hypothesi the term "something" indicates
 6      I, 46| affirmation and denial. And ex hypothesi A belongs to everything
 7     II, 2 |   belong to all C: and this ex hypothesi is true. Similarly if the
 8     II, 2 |    belong to no C: and this ex hypothesi is true.~In particular syllogisms
 9     II, 2 |     belong to some C, which ex hypothesi is true. And the premiss
10     II, 5 |     the other premisses had ex hypothesi been proved. Consequently
11     II, 13|       belong to some C. But ex hypothesi it belongs to no C, so that
12     II, 22|    neither then will C: for ex hypothesi B belonged to all C. And
13     II, 22|        to the whole AC. But ex hypothesi this is not so. A then is
14     II, 27|        be a sign of it: for ex hypothesi body and soul are affected
15     II, 27|     then have the sign: for ex hypothesi there is one sign corresponding