Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 4 |           a syllogism if both the relations of subject and predicate
 2      I, 8 | syllogisms to prove each of these relations, and syllogisms with differently
 3      I, 15|   positions. Likewise if both the relations are negative, if the major
 4      I, 15|     reason why. But if one of the relations is universal, the other
 5      I, 16|       results or not from similar relations of the terms whether we
 6      I, 18|         before. Again if both the relations are negative, and the assertoric
 7      I, 19|          possible at all.~Similar relations will obtain in particular
 8      I, 25|          case it follows that the relations of predication are one fewer
 9      I, 25|         be equal in number to the relations of predication. The premisses
10      I, 28|        must look to the aforesaid relations of the subject and predicate
11      I, 29|           in the case of possible relations, as well as terms that belong,
12     II, 2 |        least three terms, and two relations of subject and predicate
13     II, 15|         the preceding because the relations between the terms are reversed:
14     II, 15|       universal negative, and the relations between the terms may be