Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 5 |          of another (it does not matter which has the negative relation),
 2      I, 6 |          must be a syllogism, no matter which of the premisses is
 3      I, 6 |         to no R. We must put the matter as before.” Since the expression "
 4      I, 21|     negative, BC affirmative, no matter which of the two is pure;
 5      I, 27|     another predicate, save as a matter of opinion, but these may
 6      I, 27|       statement is definite, the matter is clear. Similarly one
 7      I, 29|        then we must consider the matter in this way also. The method
 8      I, 30| premisses: we have discussed the matter accurately in the treatise
 9     II, 2 |        wholly false, it does not matter which of the two is false. (
10     II, 3 |        wholly false (it does not matter which of the two premisses
11     II, 5 |         are not convertible, the matter stands as we said above).
12     II, 21|          knowledge proper to the matter in hand or to exercise such
13     II, 21|        But we must consider this matter better.~
14     II, 27| universal nor correlative to the matter in question: for though