Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 1 |     the premiss is resolved, i.e. both the predicate and that
 2      I, 5 |   are assumed as hypotheses, i.e. when we prove per impossibile.
 3      I, 15|       but from two at least, i.e. when the premisses are related
 4      I, 15|   everything that is moving, i.e. if nothing else were moving:
 5      I, 17|      a reductio ad absurdum, i.e. by claiming assent to the
 6      I, 19|   and the other problematic; i.e. suppose that A may belong
 7      I, 22|   premisses are affirmative, i.e. that A necessarily belongs
 8      I, 22| affirmative being necessary: i.e. suppose A may possibly belong
 9      I, 27|      e.g. Cleon and Callias, i.e. the individual and sensible,
10      I, 31|   either mortal or immortal: i.e. whatever is A is all either
11      I, 46|     true, but A is not true, i.e. that it is a white log.
12     II, 5 |     means of the conclusion, i.e. by converting one of the
13     II, 5 |     the universal syllogism, i.e "B belongs to some of that
14     II, 14|      be proved in both ways, i.e. per impossibile and ostensively,