Book, Paragraph

 1      I, 2 |         say that, in its technical character, it is not concerned with
 2      I, 2 |            depends on the personal character of the speaker; the second
 3      I, 2 |          by the speaker’s personal character when the speech is so spoken
 4      I, 2 |           what people think of his character before he begins to speak.
 5      I, 2 |   persuasion; on the contrary, his character may almost be called the
 6      I, 2 |             2) to understand human character and goodness in their various
 7      I, 2 |          actions have a contingent character; hardly any of them are
 8      I, 4 |           such as the strength and character of the defensive force and
 9      I, 8 |  government, for the special moral character of each is bound to provide
10      I, 9 |          is likely to produce good character. Hence it is only when a
11      I, 9 |         are evidence of the doer’s character: even if a man has not actually
12      I, 9 |        When we know what action or character is required, then, in order
13      I, 10|           his particular faults of character.~However, this subject has
14      I, 10|        cause distinctions of human character are important: e.g. the
15      I, 11|           a man see himself in the character of a fine fellow, especially
16      I, 12|       happen again. Or those whose character has been attacked in the
17      I, 15|           to questions of personal character: so, clearly, we need never
18      I, 15|         contracts depends upon the character of those who have signed
19     II, 1 |          he must also make his own character look right and put his hearers,
20     II, 1 |           s influence that his own character should look right and that
21     II, 1 |        mind. That the orator’s own character should look right is particularly
22     II, 1 |             good sense, good moral character, and goodwill. False statements
23     II, 4 |          who are like ourselves in character and occupation, provided
24     II, 4 |           what we take to be their character. Anger is always concerned
25     II, 5 |           and reckless-the kind of character produced by wealth, physical
26     II, 6 |          forms of badness of moral character, of the tokens of such badness, &
27     II, 8 |            who are like us in age, character, disposition, social standing,
28     II, 8 |       victims are persons of noble character: whenever they are so, our
29     II, 9 |         associated with good moral character; it is our duty both to
30     II, 9 |        with the same type of moral character. And their contraries are
31     II, 12|         the various types of human character, in relation to the emotions
32     II, 12|          with the Youthful type of character. Young men have strong passions,
33     II, 13|               13~Such, then is the character of the Young. The character
34     II, 13|        character of the Young. The character of Elderly Men-men who are
35     II, 13|          to have a self-controlled character; the fact is that their
36     II, 13|          and reflecting, their own character: and we can now see how
37     II, 14|        shall find that they have a character between that of the young
38     II, 15|           So much for the types of character that distinguish youth,
39     II, 15|          of Fortune by which human character is affected. First let us
40     II, 15|          Good Birth. Its effect on character is to make those who have
41     II, 15|         towards the insane type of character, like the descendants of
42     II, 16|                     16~The type of character produced by Wealth lies
43     II, 16|             In a word, the type of character produced by wealth is that
44     II, 17|           be said that the type of character it produces is mostly obvious
45     II, 17|        ambitious and more manly in character than the wealthy, because
46     II, 17|     branches produces the types of character belonging to the conditions
47     II, 17|            account of the types of character that correspond to differences
48     II, 18|         been given of the types of character that mark the different
49     II, 18|      investing speeches with moral character may now be regarded as fully
50     II, 18|            with the required moral character. We are now to proceed to
51     II, 21|       particular fact, such as the character of Iphicrates, but of a
52     II, 21|          Others have the essential character of Enthymemes, but are not
53     II, 21|           hearers’ opinion of your character, or convey an effect of
54     II, 21|            people’s opinion of our character to say, for instance, "We
55     II, 21|        invests a speech with moral character. There is moral character
56     II, 21|          character. There is moral character in every speech in which
57     II, 21|            as a man of sound moral character. So much for the Maxim-its
58     II, 22|            to those about types of character, emotions, and moral qualities.
59     II, 23|            have it appear that his character is better than that of the
60    III, 1 |        impression of the speakers’ character, or (3) by proving the truth
61    III, 1 |            tragedy has altered its character. Just as iambics were adopted,
62    III, 2 |            seems to be that of the character who is speaking, theirs
63    III, 3 |            is much done, the prose character disappears entirely. We
64    III, 7 |           it expresses emotion and character, and if it corresponds to
65    III, 7 |            expresses your personal character. Each class of men, each
66    III, 7 |           only which determine the character of a man’s for it is not
67    III, 7 |        reproduce the corresponding character; for a rustic and an educated
68    III, 7 |          If you do, the artificial character of each detail becomes apparent;
69    III, 11|             they show vehemence of character; and this is why angry people
70    III, 12|           of oratory that reflects character and the kind that reflects
71    III, 14|            good impression of your character, which always helps to secure
72    III, 16|            narration should depict character; to which end you must know
73    III, 16|          determines the quality of character depicted and is itself determined
74    III, 16|  mathematical discourses depict no character; they have nothing to do
75    III, 16|       Socratic dialogues do depict character, being concerned with moral
76    III, 16| manifestations of various types of character, e.g. "he kept walking along
77    III, 16|         sense, but this shows good character; good sense making us go
78    III, 16|           what is useful, and good character after what is noble. Where
79    III, 16|        from the first in the right character, that people may regard
80    III, 16|      employed to attack some one’s character, or to eulogize him-only
81    III, 17|          can express neither moral character nor moral purpose. Maxims
82    III, 17|         too-since these do express character: "I have given him this,
83    III, 17|            to the element of moral character: there are assertions which,